User talk:Rombler: Difference between revisions
Ohnoitsjamie (talk | contribs) cmt |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Oh, but the the rest information is correct.. [[User:Rombler|Rombler]] ([[User talk:Rombler#top|talk]]) 16:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
Oh, but the the rest information is correct.. [[User:Rombler|Rombler]] ([[User talk:Rombler#top|talk]]) 16:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
: No, there was nothing useful in your edits. "The artist was recognized for [[Billboard]] as one Reggaeton Legend also was recognized for [[Rolling Stone]] as one Reggaeton Legend and Icon" is poorly written and not not useful, and the remaining portion of your edits seemed to be just unnecessarily duplicating references. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
: No, there was nothing useful in your edits. "The artist was recognized for [[Billboard]] as one Reggaeton Legend also was recognized for [[Rolling Stone]] as one Reggaeton Legend and Icon" is poorly written and not not useful, and the remaining portion of your edits seemed to be just unnecessarily duplicating references. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 16:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
well i can fix it, the information is reliable and correct.. [[User:Rombler|Rombler]] ([[User talk:Rombler#top|talk]]) 16:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:52, 14 March 2023
Not using a neutral point-of-view, adding your own commentary
Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, the information is reliable and verified.. ¿what is the problem? Rombler (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Being casually described as "king of reggaeton" by one publication does not merit inclusion in the WP:LEDE as such. Furthermore, that article is almost 10 years old.OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Oh, but the the rest information is correct.. Rombler (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- No, there was nothing useful in your edits. "The artist was recognized for Billboard as one Reggaeton Legend also was recognized for Rolling Stone as one Reggaeton Legend and Icon" is poorly written and not not useful, and the remaining portion of your edits seemed to be just unnecessarily duplicating references. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
well i can fix it, the information is reliable and correct.. Rombler (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)