Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prem Sooriyakumar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:06, 15 March 2023

Prem Sooriyakumar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly referenced as passing our notability criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on coverage and analysis about them and their work -- but the only notability claim being made here is that he exists, and the only reference is a brief glancing namecheck of his existence as a person who spoke about his experiences as an immigrant in a museum exhibition, and even on a search for other sources I just can't find anything but primary sources. Bearcat (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The only Google News result I got was a passing mention in this article published by a student newspaper, which certainly isn't enough to confer notability. — SamX [talk · contribs] 04:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 22:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject matter fails general notability guidelines per WP:PERSON Ñ•ætin👨 (talk) 06:58, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The only attached source doesn't cover the subject in-depth; a one mere passing mention. A quick search doesn't reveal more sources available up to now. AmshitBalcon (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per nomination, for all the content, I am not sure that it meets WP:GNG --Loewstisch (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only source that is attached only makes a cursory reference of the topic. There are no additional sources currently accessible, despite a quick search. Khorang 17:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Attached sources are not convincing at all. Ambrosiawater (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 17:04, 14 March 2023 edit Khorang (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,889 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:06, 15 March 2023 edit undo Ambrosiawater (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,089 edits →Prem Sooriyakumar Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	*'''Delete''' The only source that is attached only makes a cursory reference of the topic. There are no additional sources currently accessible, despite a quick search. '''[[User:Khorang\|<span style="font-family:monotype corsiva; color:#2554c7; font-size:14px; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:1px; font-style: italic; background-color:#ffe87c; text-align:center; margin:0px;">Khorang </span>]]''' 17:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' The only source that is attached only makes a cursory reference of the topic. There are no additional sources currently accessible, despite a quick search. '''[[User:Khorang\|<span style="font-family:monotype corsiva; color:#2554c7; font-size:14px; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:1px; font-style: italic; background-color:#ffe87c; text-align:center; margin:0px;">Khorang </span>]]''' 17:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''' Attached sources are not convincing at all. [[User:Ambrosiawater\|Ambrosiawater]] ([[User talk:Ambrosiawater\|talk]]) 11:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)