Talk:Recirculating ball: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
yup |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
An illustration would be nice. --[[User:81.21.45.44|81.21.45.44]] 20:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC) |
An illustration would be nice. --[[User:81.21.45.44|81.21.45.44]] 20:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Indeed so. [[User:Gerbrant|Shinobu]] 21:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
:Indeed so. [[User:Gerbrant|Shinobu]] 21:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
I changed alot of the info so its more clear, and added a few pictures. If anyone is good at formatting, it could sure use some. |
Revision as of 13:41, 12 March 2007
So can anyone discuss the merits of rack & pinion system over the recirculating ball approach?--Hooperbloob 03:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
An illustration would be nice. --81.21.45.44 20:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed so. Shinobu 21:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I changed alot of the info so its more clear, and added a few pictures. If anyone is good at formatting, it could sure use some.