Jump to content

Talk:Recirculating ball: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Gerbrant (talk | contribs)
yup
Biggie313 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
An illustration would be nice. --[[User:81.21.45.44|81.21.45.44]] 20:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
An illustration would be nice. --[[User:81.21.45.44|81.21.45.44]] 20:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
:Indeed so. [[User:Gerbrant|Shinobu]] 21:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
:Indeed so. [[User:Gerbrant|Shinobu]] 21:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

I changed alot of the info so its more clear, and added a few pictures. If anyone is good at formatting, it could sure use some.

Revision as of 13:41, 12 March 2007

So can anyone discuss the merits of rack & pinion system over the recirculating ball approach?--Hooperbloob 03:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An illustration would be nice. --81.21.45.44 20:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed so. Shinobu 21:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed alot of the info so its more clear, and added a few pictures. If anyone is good at formatting, it could sure use some.