This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
So can anyone discuss the merits of rack & pinion system over the recirculating ball approach?--Hooperbloob 03:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't KNOW so I'm going to have to write this here but I think the main advantage of rack and pinion steering can go from lock to lock in fewer steering wheel turns. Also, on the BMW E39, every one used rack and pinion except the V8s because the larger engines meant a rack and pinion system was too large. Chrisjwowen (talk) 19:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
An illustration would be nice. --18.104.22.168 20:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
The recirculating ball type is used in off-road vehicles and trucks because it's stronger and more durable. The rack-and-pinion type has to be replaced from time to time since they get bent or broken with hard use. Santamoly (talk) 06:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
I would term that instead as, "the obsolete and imprecise recirculating ball steering box has lasted longer in off-road vehicles, where its limitations are less obvious and its compact shape less prone to impact damage". These aren't really advantages, it's just easier to live with the disadvantages off-road. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:47, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
I changed alot of the info so its more clear, and added a few pictures. If anyone is good at formatting, it could sure use some. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggie313 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 12 March 2007
Well done for expanding the article, but sadly I think your images are about to be deleted. They say they are copyright (of the "how stuff works" website) so they can't be used here on Wikipedia. If you are able to, it might be helpful to recreate your own version of the images. – Kieran T(talk) 13:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)