User talk:HighKing: Difference between revisions
→AfD question: new section |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Please remember to sign your comments. It's a rare mistake but I thought I'd mention it. Thanks again for your contributions. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 04:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
Please remember to sign your comments. It's a rare mistake but I thought I'd mention it. Thanks again for your contributions. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 04:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
== AfD question == |
|||
Curious, as I may have some old CORPs to bring to AfD as I work through old COI templates, is it better to always drop a quick source summary highlighting each as part of the nomination, as a new comment, or wait to see where the AfD is going? I usually go for brief statement, but seeing how long it took to get someone to respond, wondering if I need a better appoach. [[User:Slywriter|Slywriter]] ([[User talk:Slywriter|talk]]) 18:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:01, 29 March 2023
| This is HighKing's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
You are welcome to leave messages here. If you place a message here, then I will reply here (rather than on, say, your user page). Conversely, if I've left a message on your talk page, please tag me by using something like {{u|HighKing}} so I'll be notified and will reply on your Talk page.
AFDs
Hello, HighKing,
While I don't agree with your source assessments 100% of the time (but usually I do!), I greatly appreciate you going over the notability criteria for businesses and organizations time and time again. I've learned a lot from reading your comments and I'm sure that other editors have as well. Thank you for your patience in explaining the same policy information over and over in each AFD as well as taking the time in a discussion to do your own research into the sources, both those included in the article as well as those brought up during a discussion. It makes a huge difference when assessing a deletion discussion to have editors actually do some research into notability rather than just offering a casual opinion. Thank you for your regular, thoughtful participation in the AFD area. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to write those kind words. I'm still learning too and I've also made mistakes in the past. We can only try to do better next time. I also appreciate your thoughful closes at AfD, a job that is often thankless. HighKing++ 12:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey, HighKing,
Please remember to sign your comments. It's a rare mistake but I thought I'd mention it. Thanks again for your contributions. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
AfD question
Curious, as I may have some old CORPs to bring to AfD as I work through old COI templates, is it better to always drop a quick source summary highlighting each as part of the nomination, as a new comment, or wait to see where the AfD is going? I usually go for brief statement, but seeing how long it took to get someone to respond, wondering if I need a better appoach. Slywriter (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)