Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Out of the Rain: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: Line 9:


*'''Delete''' unless sources other than standard reviews can be found...but the article's been tagged for needing them since 2014, and that evidently hasn't led to the issue being addressed. [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 15:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' unless sources other than standard reviews can be found...but the article's been tagged for needing them since 2014, and that evidently hasn't led to the issue being addressed. [[User:Doniago|DonIago]] ([[User talk:Doniago|talk]]) 15:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' [https://www.ign.com/articles/2008/04/10/torchwood-from-out-of-the-rain-review IGN], [https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/cult/a91867/s02e10-from-out-of-the-rain-91867/ DigitalSpy] give two RS reviews, meets GNG. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 04:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:52, 30 April 2023

From Out of the Rain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not every TV episode needs an article, especially one that there are no RS reviews for. This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid. In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]