User talk:Tzaquiel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1154787424 by Julius Senegal (talk) stale, non-specific warning |
←Blanked the page Tags: Blanking Manual revert |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion == |
|||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 21:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== May 2023 == |
|||
<div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 22:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|reason=I understand that I may have run afoul of 3RR, but I need it to be known that at no point did I approach anything resembling 'damage or disruption.' A review will show that I have been providing citations and references, while the same user who mass-deleted my edits immediately sent me a warning when I reverted their change ''for the first time''. I believe that my block should be lifted firstly because I have some time this weekend and this is how I'd like to use it, and secondly because I have been reported by a rascal. I've been on Wikipedia for a very long time and this is the first time I've ever had any issue like this. - [[User:Tzaquiel|Tzaquiel]] ([[User talk:Tzaquiel#top|talk]]) 23:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)|decline=Insulting people in your unblock request generally doesn't work so well. Also, you're blocked for edit warring, not for being wrong. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 00:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
== Introduction to contentious topics == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles''', a topic designated as '''[[WP:AC/CT|contentious]]'''. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. |
|||
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. |
|||
Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: |
|||
*adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia; |
|||
*comply with all applicable policies and guidelines; |
|||
*follow editorial and behavioural best practice; |
|||
*comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and |
|||
*refrain from gaming the system. |
|||
<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks' noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> |
|||
Also: |
|||
: [[File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics]]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> |
|||
[[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 00:44, 14 May 2023 (UTC) |
|||