Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Foley Catholic High School (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating 2nd deletion discussion for Bishop Foley Catholic High School
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
Before you ask, I did check all the established [[WP:ATD|alternatives to deletion]] and determined that none of them will work in this case.
Before you ask, I did check all the established [[WP:ATD|alternatives to deletion]] and determined that none of them will work in this case.


P.S. Source searching per [[WP:BEFORE]] is not required; however, I did conduct a search for reputable sources, coming up short.
P.S. Source searching per [[WP:BEFORE]] is not required (as stated by [[User:FOARP]]; however, I did conduct a brief search for reputable sources, coming up short.
''Namethatisnotinuse'' [[User:Namethatisnotinuse|Namethatisnotinuse]] ([[User talk:Namethatisnotinuse|talk]]) 17:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
''Namethatisnotinuse'' [[User:Namethatisnotinuse|Namethatisnotinuse]] ([[User talk:Namethatisnotinuse|talk]]) 17:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:20, 18 May 2023

Bishop Foley Catholic High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the second time this discussion has begun. I've noticed that the page in question contains a general lack of secondary and tertiary sources, which are hard to find.

Another problem is that the page is formatted as though it's an advertisement. I personally believe that this article qualifies under WP:TNT, as no amount of repair will fix this. The sexual assault controversy with former school president Gerry LeBoeuf, though notable in its own right, is not nearly notable enough to be included. While alumni Tom Jankiewicz & John Keating are very notable in their own right, they are pretty much the meat of the article, minus multiple statistics and MHSAA sport listings.

Finally, the article severely violates WP:V, depending too much on primary sources; however, as stated previously, secondary sources are hard to come by.

Before you ask, I did check all the established alternatives to deletion and determined that none of them will work in this case.

P.S. Source searching per WP:BEFORE is not required (as stated by User:FOARP; however, I did conduct a brief search for reputable sources, coming up short. Namethatisnotinuse Namethatisnotinuse (talk) 17:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]