User talk:Kurykh: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:24, 17 March 2007

Welcome!

Hello, physicq210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bachrach44 01:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Aviation Newsletter delivery

The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 18:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your accusations

Did I somehow manage to tangle with someone in your clique? If so, please accept my DEEPEST apologies. I simply can't think of any other reason you could come to the conclusions you did about the thread I posted in the RfA discussion page. One way or the other though, you're simply wrong. Please point directly to ANYTHING in my message that would be considered "trolling", and also to where posting my reasoning to a closed RfA's DISCUSSION page is against ANY Wiki policy. In the absence of your doing so, I'll ask that you withdraw your accusations in bad faith that I was trolling or that I was in any way "hounding" someone. My thread was direct, honest, and most definitely NOT a personal atttack in any way. (It's also interesting when you happened to choose to archive.)K. Scott Bailey 00:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, Physicq210, and considering your concern at unwarranted and unneeded comments about Chacor, this is a little over the top. Expressing one's permanent distrust of another editor, especially in the controversial circumstances of the RfA, is nothing like "akin to defiling someone's grave". Really, in no way whatsoever. Adminship is "no big deal" and therefore failing an RfA is not a terminal condition.

Yes, the comments were probably best removed and no, they shouldn't be re-instated. But throwing such innapropriate analogies around is unhelful at best and inflammatory baiting at worse. Please lets be try to resolve this incident rather than reignite it. Rockpocket 01:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Being prone to hyperbole myself, I know what its like to occasionally overstate your case in the heat of the moment. I always appreciate being asked to reconsider them, so I thought I would pass it on. Best wishes, Rockpocket 02:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some help? (Part deux)

I don't know if you missed my follow up at User talk:Physicq210/Archive 4#Some help, but the user has uploaded the same pictures again (Image:Pagemcconnell199.jpg & Image:Jonfishman18.jpg) and is claiming to be Frank Stevens, the original photographer of these photos when at http://www.musicgods.com/momentends/ it states " All photographs and contents of this site are © 2000 John Davis. All Rights Reserved." The user brings up the copyright notice, though, which seems to contradict itself at http://www.musicgods.com/momentends/copyright.html since it says both:

"The Moment Ends Photography encourages artists to use the images for non-commercial and non-profit projects, especially CD-R cover artwork."

&

"Any other reproduction or manipulation of these images without the permission of The Moment Ends Photography is a violation of copyright. No images are within Public Domain."

Please, any help would be appreciated or telling me who else can help me. Thanks! -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 02:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page in Category:Archival templates

Ok, I took a look and cannot quite figure out how your user page ended up being listed in Category:Archival templates. I didn't want to mess anything up, but want to let you know. — MrDolomite • Talk 10:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:How?

I think AAA! (talk · contribs) is an awfully confused username to me. Groupempty (talk • contribs) 04:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 Ok, I took a look and cannot quite figure out how your user page ended up being listed in {{ccl|Archival templates}}.  I didn't want to mess anything up, but want to let you know.<small> &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:MrDolomite|MrDolomite]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[User talk:MrDolomite|Talk]]</small> 10:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
+== Re:How? ==
+I think {{User|AAA!}} is an awfully confused username to me. [[User:{{{User|Groupempty}}}|{{{User|Groupempty}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{User|Groupempty}}}|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/{{{User|Groupempty}}}|contribs]]) 04:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)