Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Invisibelibrarian: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Adding new report for Invisibelibrarian. |
→Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: Suggest decline Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
*I am a checkuser, not a clerk. This case is currently awaiting a clerk to ''endorse'' or ''decline'' the request. As an opinion only, I suggest the data is likely stale so there's probably nothing a checkuser can do. That is, I think this could be ''declined''. We do sometimes strike it lucky with the logs, though. --[[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 21:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:56, 16 July 2023
Invisibelibrarian
- Invisibelibrarian (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: suspected
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Invisibelibrarian/Archive.
16 July 2023
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Salivahana (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools
Same topic area, in and around N. Chandrababu Naidu article. The sock master was notable for bloating the article and make it look like a humongous resume in the Dec 2019 - Apr 2020 period [1]. THe suspected sock seems to be doing the same [2] [3]. Interaction [4]. Requesting CU. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I am a checkuser, not a clerk. This case is currently awaiting a clerk to endorse or decline the request. As an opinion only, I suggest the data is likely stale so there's probably nothing a checkuser can do. That is, I think this could be declined. We do sometimes strike it lucky with the logs, though. --Yamla (talk) 21:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)