Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zotiel (angel): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Zotiel (angel): Reply |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
One mention in a religious text and scattered references elsewhere do not bode well for notability. Fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Edward-Woodrow|Edward-Woodrow]] :) <sub><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Edward-Woodrow|talk]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sub> 14:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
One mention in a religious text and scattered references elsewhere do not bode well for notability. Fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Edward-Woodrow|Edward-Woodrow]] :) <sub><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Edward-Woodrow|talk]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sub> 14:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Religion|list of Religion-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Edward-Woodrow|Edward-Woodrow]] :) <sub><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Edward-Woodrow|talk]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sub> 14:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Religion|list of Religion-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Edward-Woodrow|Edward-Woodrow]] :) <sub><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Edward-Woodrow|talk]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sub> 14:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)</small> |
||
*:In which case, how does my draft article differ from many other Wikipedia stubs (not just those related to religion) which do not have as much references and "secondary analysis" as mine? I also welcome if you (or the adjudicators and other community members) also have other suggestions such as inclusion of this text under some main article where it is better suited. Otherwise, |
*:In which case, how does my draft article differ from many other Wikipedia stubs (not just those related to religion) which do not have as much references and "secondary analysis" as mine? I also welcome if you (or the adjudicators and other community members) also have other suggestions such as inclusion of this text under some main article where it is better suited. Otherwise, your nomination is just being arbitrary and implies that the contributions made are so minuscule regardless if it was mentioned in the book of Enoch as among the angels. [[User:Paul Christian B. Yang-ed|Pcbyed]] ([[User talk:Paul Christian B. Yang-ed|talk]]) 15:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:46, 23 July 2023
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zotiel (angel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One mention in a religious text and scattered references elsewhere do not bode well for notability. Fails WP:GNG. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- In which case, how does my draft article differ from many other Wikipedia stubs (not just those related to religion) which do not have as much references and "secondary analysis" as mine? I also welcome if you (or the adjudicators and other community members) also have other suggestions such as inclusion of this text under some main article where it is better suited. Otherwise, your nomination is just being arbitrary and implies that the contributions made are so minuscule regardless if it was mentioned in the book of Enoch as among the angels. Pcbyed (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)