User talk:Nccondor23: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:13, 27 July 2023

William B. Allen

No other entries in category African American political scientist are identified by their ideological orientatio. Also, regarding, "He has authored The Imaginative Conservative and Re-thinking Uncle Tom," the former is inaccurate and the latter is duplicative - see: Select bibliography entry #3: Re-Thinking Uncle Tom: The Political Philosophy of H. B. Stowe (Lexington Books), 2008. OckRaz ^talk 21:11, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

African American political scientist is NOT a "category." What is wrong with you? His political ideologies are absolutely not only relevant but important.

He's an author at The Imaginative Conservative. I'll fix that typo.

Listing his more important works outside of a "select Bibliography" is fair game, which includes The Uncle Tom book AND his work with Hillsdale AND appearing on Ben Shapiro's show.

Wiki is supposed to be about truth, NOT your personal opinion. Nccondor23 (talk) 21:59, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh, so it is a category. gross! Nccondor23 (talk) 22:07, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why isn't he listed as an American political scientist? what's going on with wiki!!! Nccondor23 (talk) 22:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it's a smaller category, and i checked all the other pages in it. checking every political scientist would have taken a long time. a smaller category like afr am poli sci's can be checked relatively quickly, which is why i chose it: to look at the standard for writing the lead paragraph. OckRaz ^talk 23:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not fair game to say "Uncle Tom" book when it's not about Uncle Tom (a fictional character whose name became an epithet), but "The Political Philosophy of H. B. Stowe," (the author of the novel) which becomes obvious when the full title is used - which it already was in the bibliography before your addition to the lead. I've added the fact that he's a contributor to Imprimus and Imaginative Conservative to the publication section. OckRaz ^talk 23:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I don't agree with much of what you want, but I made it so anyway, despite the fact that he in the American Social Scientists category but NOT the American Political Scientists. Nothing I've added is false in any way. Nccondor23 (talk) 22:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :::why isn't he listed as an American political scientist? what's going on with wiki!!! [[User:Nccondor23|Nccondor23]] ([[User talk:Nccondor23#top|talk]]) 22:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 :::it's a smaller category, and i checked all the other pages in it. checking every political scientist would have taken a long time. a smaller category like afr am poli sci's can be checked relatively quickly, which is why i chose it: to look at the standard for writing the lead paragraph. [[User:OckRaz|<b style="color:Purple;">Ock</b><b style="color:Black;">''Raz''</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:OckRaz|<b style="color:Green;">talk</b>]]</sup> 23:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
+::It's not fair game to say "Uncle Tom" book when it's not about Uncle Tom (a fictional character whose name became an epithet), but "The Political Philosophy of H. B. Stowe," (the author of the novel) which becomes obvious when the full title is used - which it already was in the bibliography before your addition to the lead. I've added the fact that he's a contributor to Imprimus and Imaginative Conservative to the publication section. [[User:OckRaz|<b style="color:Purple;">Ock</b><b style="color:Black;">''Raz''</b>]] <sup>[[User talk:OckRaz|<b style="color:Green;">talk</b>]]</sup> 23:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
 :Okay, I don't agree with much of what you want, but I made it so anyway, despite the fact that he in the American Social Scientists category but NOT the American Political Scientists. Nothing I've added is false in any way. [[User:Nccondor23|Nccondor23]] ([[User talk:Nccondor23#top|talk]]) 22:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)