Jump to content

User talk:Bonadea/Archive 16: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reply
Line 159: Line 159:


:You have misunderstood matters. I have never told you what to do. I have told you what '''not''' to do (namely, vandalize Wikipedia). But I see that your actions caught up with you. --[[User:Bonadea|Bonadea]] 20:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
:You have misunderstood matters. I have never told you what to do. I have told you what '''not''' to do (namely, vandalize Wikipedia). But I see that your actions caught up with you. --[[User:Bonadea|Bonadea]] 20:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

==Please don't do this.==

Past life is NOT THE SAME as REINCARNATION.

What you did is vandalism. I will appreciate if you d not do thjings when you do not know the matter well.

Reincarnation is rebirth of a person whose identity is maintained in the present birth by way of total detailed memory and Past life is memory of many past births which is not so clear without support.

We cannot say that every individual is a reincarnation of someone, but every individual does have a past life of which he can remember on getting due guidence.

Will you not let others get the support to see past life?

This is a request. Do not indulge into vadalism again.
[[User:Rekhaa Kale|Rekhaa Kale]] 14:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:27, 22 March 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Bonadea, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Budgiekiller 18:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I need some help!

Slightly difficult situation: I've tried to leave messages to another user on their talk page, but they have redirected their user talk page to an article in the main Wikipedia -- see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Deenyk . This means that there is an article (Carlos Contreras, Emmy Winning Language Software Developer) which contains a user talk page, and that can't be right. I'm just a newbie myself, and was merely trying to clean up some spam; I'm not going to go in and tamper with other people's talk pages! I'd be really grateful if somebody with more experience could look at this, and move or tag or whatever. (The user in question has been advertising their company in a number of articles.) Sorry if this is a really basic thing but I don't know how to proceed.

Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bonadea (talkcontribs).

Hey, not a problem. Normal user pages shouldn't redirect to articles so I've cleared the user page to prevent this from happening. I can see that the user in question is prone to spamming the Wikipedia so it's not a big problem to go ahead, be bold and remove his/her edits! Good luck in the future, and if you have any further questions, get in touch! Budgiekiller 23:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for editing the page Aquamania on Wikipedia. The vandalism you reverted is not obvious vandalism so your edit has been reverted. Natl1 22:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Not obvious? The page history of Aquamania contains detailed edit summaries as well as other information which would have saved you the trouble of reverting the edit and posting this. Thanks all the same. --Bonadea 08:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Non-Biased Articles

Hello!

Quote: “NPOV requires views to be represented without bias. All editors and all sources have biases. A bias is a prejudice in a general or specific sense, usually in the sense of having a predilection for one particular point of view or ideology. One is said to be biased if one is influenced by one's biases. A bias could, for example, lead one to accept or not accept the truth of a claim, not because of the strength of the claim itself, but because it does or does not correspond to one's own preconceived ideas.”

I would like to bring to your attention the bias in the Final Cut Pro article.

Quote from article: “Final Cut Pro is a professional non-linear editing system created by Apple Computer that allows users to edit video.”

Correction – Final Cut Pro is a consumer to prosumer product.

Quote from article: “From the early 2000s, Final Cut has developed a large user base and is the first low cost mass market product to seriously challenge the monopoly of Avid editing products - the most well-established non linear editing system.”

Corrections: Yes, Final Cut Pro is developing a larger user group, but not to the point it is ‘seriously’ challenging the monopoly of Avid. Using this logic, it’s safe to say Windows Movie maker is seriously challenging the monopoly of Avid. Avid have over 2800 feature film editing seats. Final Cut have under 100. Yup, that’s challenging Avid’s Monopoly.

Quote from article: “As such, it has driven down the cost of professional video editing and has created a new class of product in professional applications – the desktop editor.”

Corrections: I’m sorry, but if you expect this to be true, I’m a monkey’s uncle. Real professional editing systems, like that of Avid Symphony, cost in and around $2,300,000. Prices of video, and all other technology are going down not because of Apple, but because this technology is getting cheaper.

If you want to be neutral, you would have no problem leaving in the negative aspects of Final Cut Pro (which out rule the positives). We are trying to educate, not land a job with Apple as a sales manager.

Clearly you are trying to land a job as an Avid sales manager. It's galling that you accuse more balanced users of your own agenda specific behavior. --FBFP 09:18, 31 December 2006

Please do not tell me to be neutral, because you certainly are not. I apologize for taking your comment so seriously,

--AvidLiquid 22:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

To be clear: What I did was reverting an edit which I interpreted as POV, since your username indicates that you may be affiliated with Avid. I did not add or remove any text which was not there before your edit, I simply restored the previous version. My edit was a mistake since I don't know the subject at all, never having used any video editing software; for that reason alone, I shouldn't have edited the article. --Bonadea 08:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:New Year

thanks for the comment, its much appreciated, most of the vandalism comes from the schools ip itself, it all rather childish...--JWJW Have a nice day :) 14:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Johnson and Edial

Thanks for your speedy edits - I was mainly interested in Johnson's black servant Frank Barber - I'd be glad for any edits you can give to that. Also to Elmfield College.

Thanks
Johnbibby 13:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Hej Bonadea!

Eftersom inte du tyckte att jag skulle ha en sån artikel om Öje så skulle jag vilja ta bort den. Men, jag vet inte hur man gör för att ta bort den så jag undrar om du kanske kunde säga till mig hur man gör.

Tack på förhand!

/StoffeLito

WikiProject Wikify

XhantarTalk 11:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

A vandelizer

Mtnbike256 continnualy vandilizes wikipedia and should be banned immediately. He is also known as Science72

Anders Ljungqvist

You're welcome.--Carabinieri 21:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

An article which you started, Anders Ljungqvist, was selected for DYK!

Updated DYK query On February 3, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anders Ljungqvist, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.


Thanks for your contributions! --Camptown 22:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

if i feel mistreated i act

If i feel mistreated by someone here on wiki i act.just like when i wrote an article on addis black widow and someone 30seconds later came in and put deletion on the page without even reading any of it i wrote back to the person and told him he did wrong. and i will do that im not the silent type of person.and you tell me to be civil. how nice is that? /matrix17

Matrix, you do have a very "sharp" and "pointy" kind of debating style that could be caused by a language barrier - which is somewhat understandable. In debates on Wikipedia it's almost always far better to tune down some of the arguments one tries to highlight and keeping oneself calm and correct. It has after all been pointed out numerous times and with great detail what you can do to increase the quality of your material - it has nothing to do with you as a person, it's only about keeping the quality of the articles here. There's no other agenda and nobody is against you.
Sure, one can feel mistreated, but it's always a good idea to step away from the keyboard and think about it pnce or twice (to calm down the first feelings) before throwing oneself directly into the flames. I think that if you read some of the tips and links that has been given to you on your talk page, and looked around at how other articles about similar subjects are written, you soon'll get the hang of it. --Strangnet 01:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

personal attack

I indef blocked the vandal as well... --BozMo talk 12:24, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, so I saw. Good riddance.--Bonadea 12:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


Mm liksom inte för att de har någon jättestor betydelse för mig egentligen. men de liksom känn som att Isotope du vet är helt besatt av att följa efter och radera,ändra o provocera mig. har liksom varit på sidan 6 månader eler nåt innn utan problem och så kommer han o bara börjar tjata. menmen, ja vet att det behövs mycket referenser fö att få ha kvar e sida på wikipedia. men många här är också sådär att dom går in kollar på en ny artikel o sätter snabb delete på dom direkt o det är mest detsom stör mej ignoransen, jag skulle aldrig vara otrevlig mot isotope om inte han var så otrevlig mot mej från första början. MVH/ matrix17

Men 90% av mina sidor får ju vara kvar så ska inte klaga;) /matrix17

Hmmm, my ears are burning...--Isotope23 18:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I was more-than-half joking

WP:TALK#Good_practice... but honestly I don't care. I just saw my username and was kidding around.--Isotope23 19:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

dont agree, but thanks

I dont agree with your opinion that katarina Wigander is a badly written page. maybe not the best but not bad. But its wa sgood that you reverted the blank,thansk /matrix17

Thank you, re:Xpango

Thank you for stepping in on this issue. I'm a new user unfamiliar with correct procedure and felt it best if I step back from the issue. Abort-O-Matic 5000 09:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


Can u tell me how to delete a file that i uploaded?

Thanx you for reminding me of the inappropriateness of the article Xpango intitially . I have changed it now (PLZ view the talk page of the article) . But i m writting this to ask you if you know how i can delete a file that i uploaded by a wrong name as a result of which it is useless now ? Moreover , i m afraid it is unnecessarily using space on the wikipedia database . Hope to hear a reply as soon as possible .... Thanking You --Nishantsharma87 09:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Nishant Sharma (India)

Loyola Institute of Business Administration

I can't find any third party reliable sources to use for this article. Thus I expect it's non-notable. If you can find some, please add them to the article. Otherwise, I am going to AFD it soon. coelacan18:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough - I'll see if I can find anything. I noticed after removing the tag that it seems like a division of the Loyola College, Chennai so perhaps it should be incorporated in that article.--Bonadea 18:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


No problem

Thanks for the thanks... (confising) and thanks for the rose! :D --Samtheboy (t/c) 08:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on Love is a Rose. Have a wonderful day!
Saber girl08 12:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Considering the Tom Somerville page

please delete it and IP-ban my address. A couple of people at my school (from where this message is posted) are misusing the possibilities of Wikipedia to make personal attacks against me. The Tom Somerville-page is my may of striking back at them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tommeren (talkcontribs) 12:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC).

Sorry to hear about the personal attacks, and I'd help you if I could. However, I am not an administrator, and can neither remove pages nor block IPs. (Creating articles as retalitation isn't really a good way of getting back, but you knew that already.) You should get in touch with one or other of the administrators. Best of luck.--Bonadea 16:00, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment moved from user page

I have one thing to say to you Bonadea.............  :) thanks for watching my smiley face. O, and what I wrote about the bugatti is completely true, that stuff that you deleted. I'm talking about the first time, the second time was just to see if you would delete it again. YOU ROCK BONADEA... YOUR THE BOMB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vermen1993 (talkcontribs)


ANSWER ME THIS

WHO ARE YOU TO TELL ME WHAT TO DO HUH ANSWER ME— Preceding unsigned comment added by Newmexicoman (talkcontribs) 20:32, March 19, 2007 (UTC)

You have misunderstood matters. I have never told you what to do. I have told you what not to do (namely, vandalize Wikipedia). But I see that your actions caught up with you. --Bonadea 20:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Please don't do this.

Past life is NOT THE SAME as REINCARNATION.

What you did is vandalism. I will appreciate if you d not do thjings when you do not know the matter well.

Reincarnation is rebirth of a person whose identity is maintained in the present birth by way of total detailed memory and Past life is memory of many past births which is not so clear without support.

We cannot say that every individual is a reincarnation of someone, but every individual does have a past life of which he can remember on getting due guidence.

Will you not let others get the support to see past life?

This is a request. Do not indulge into vadalism again. Rekhaa Kale 14:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)