Jump to content

User talk:Squared.Circle.Boxing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Topic ban: new section
Tags: Reverted New topic
Undid revision 1174169687 by SarekOfVulcan (talk) Won't affect my editing; won't prevent anything; notches on pitchforks lol
Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 23: Line 23:
:So these {{tq|special rules}} aren't a sperate set of rules, it's just standard policy being enforced with an extra dash of no tollerance? – [[User:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: red">''<sup>2</sup>''</span>]].[[User:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: blue">'''''O'''''</span>]].[[User talk:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: red"><sup>''Boxing''</sup></span>]] 09:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
:So these {{tq|special rules}} aren't a sperate set of rules, it's just standard policy being enforced with an extra dash of no tollerance? – [[User:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: red">''<sup>2</sup>''</span>]].[[User:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: blue">'''''O'''''</span>]].[[User talk:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: red"><sup>''Boxing''</sup></span>]] 09:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
:That applies to any page on Wikipedia. – [[User:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: red">''<sup>2</sup>''</span>]].[[User:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: blue">'''''O'''''</span>]].[[User talk:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: red"><sup>''Boxing''</sup></span>]] 09:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
:That applies to any page on Wikipedia. – [[User:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: red">''<sup>2</sup>''</span>]].[[User:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: blue">'''''O'''''</span>]].[[User talk:Squared.Circle.Boxing|<span style="color: red"><sup>''Boxing''</sup></span>]] 09:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

== Topic ban ==

As a result of {{diff|Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|prev|1174169229|this ANI discussion}}, you are indefinitely topic-banned from the [[WP:GENSEX]] topic area, broadly construed. --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|<span class="gfSarekSig">SarekOfVulcan (talk)</span>]] 19:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:28, 7 September 2023

Probably won't reply. Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars, especially when you're on the wrong end of an edit war. It's just silly.

ANI

Hello. This is a courtesy notice to let you know that I have un-archived the ANI at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Did I do the right thing here? so that there can be further discussion. This ANI concerns you, so I thought it best to inform you so that you are not taken by surprise. Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

––FormalDude (talk) 09:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So these special rules aren't a sperate set of rules, it's just standard policy being enforced with an extra dash of no tollerance? – 2.O.Boxing 09:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That applies to any page on Wikipedia. – 2.O.Boxing 09:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]