Jump to content

Talk:Purdue University Global: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JA1776 (talk | contribs)
JA1776 (talk | contribs)
Line 21: Line 21:
== Dispute Resolution and the 12.5% issue ==
== Dispute Resolution and the 12.5% issue ==
Editor [[User:Ushistorygeek|Ushistorygeek]] has restored language that has been rejected by other users and discussed on the talk page ad nauseam (See archive 4 and 5). In response to the inability to reach an agreement, I requested the matter be sorted out on the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard last April or May.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&oldid=prev&diff=1152866797</ref>. [[User:Ushistorygeek|Ushistorygeek]] agreed to participate and user @[[User:Robert McClenon|RobertMcClenon]] agreed to moderate. However, in the end, @UShistorygeek ultimately did not participate and ushistorygeek's language was rejected without objection until this weekend when @ushistorygeek returned to the page to restore the user's previously disputed edits. Given the degree to which this issue has already been discussed, I suggest either the language that has been in place for several months be restored or that we once again return to the dispute resolution noticeboard. This is new territory for me so if [[User:Robert McClenon|RobertMcClenon]] or any other editors have advice, I welcome their thoughts. [[User:JA1776|JA1776]] ([[User talk:JA1776|talk]]) 04:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Editor [[User:Ushistorygeek|Ushistorygeek]] has restored language that has been rejected by other users and discussed on the talk page ad nauseam (See archive 4 and 5). In response to the inability to reach an agreement, I requested the matter be sorted out on the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard last April or May.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&oldid=prev&diff=1152866797</ref>. [[User:Ushistorygeek|Ushistorygeek]] agreed to participate and user @[[User:Robert McClenon|RobertMcClenon]] agreed to moderate. However, in the end, @UShistorygeek ultimately did not participate and ushistorygeek's language was rejected without objection until this weekend when @ushistorygeek returned to the page to restore the user's previously disputed edits. Given the degree to which this issue has already been discussed, I suggest either the language that has been in place for several months be restored or that we once again return to the dispute resolution noticeboard. This is new territory for me so if [[User:Robert McClenon|RobertMcClenon]] or any other editors have advice, I welcome their thoughts. [[User:JA1776|JA1776]] ([[User talk:JA1776|talk]]) 04:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

:As I look at this again this morning, there is some important and properly sourced info about the leadership of Purdue Global that has been removed by recent edits that I am going to restore. I also am going to restore the 12.5% compromise language that has been accepted on here for several months and is already a compromise. If any users disagree, I invite them to initiate a dispute resolution process because this is an issue that has been excessively discussed in the talk archives. [[User:JA1776|JA1776]] ([[User talk:JA1776|talk]]) 14:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:29, 12 September 2023

WikiProject iconPurdue B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Purdue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Purdue University, the Purdue University system, and the Purdue Boilermakers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHigher education Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Logo Needs Updating

Purdue Global undwent a rebrand. We would like to update this page with our new logo. The new logo can be seen on our website. I will need to ask a colleague with access to the required credentials to make this update. We plan to make the update in the coming week. Ahawk37 (talk) 22:41, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This issue was discussed months ago on the talk page, see Archive 3. Although at the time I was unaware of this comment from @Ahawk37, I recently made such an edit because I thought the update made sense and there was no objection to my proposal to make the change in the discussion which is now found in Archive 3. However, the recent change was reverted by editor @Ushistorygeek without explanation. I see no reason for this revert and request that @Ushistorygeek offer a justification for the revert on this page or to please restore the edit. JA1776 (talk) 04:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It looks to me like most Wikipedia pages use new logos but indicate how long the logo has been in use. I am going to restore the logo but add the explanation that this logo has been used since 2023. This isn't my expertise so I welcome other options if anyone has thoughts. JA1776 (talk) 14:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution and the 12.5% issue

Editor Ushistorygeek has restored language that has been rejected by other users and discussed on the talk page ad nauseam (See archive 4 and 5). In response to the inability to reach an agreement, I requested the matter be sorted out on the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard last April or May.[1]. Ushistorygeek agreed to participate and user @RobertMcClenon agreed to moderate. However, in the end, @UShistorygeek ultimately did not participate and ushistorygeek's language was rejected without objection until this weekend when @ushistorygeek returned to the page to restore the user's previously disputed edits. Given the degree to which this issue has already been discussed, I suggest either the language that has been in place for several months be restored or that we once again return to the dispute resolution noticeboard. This is new territory for me so if RobertMcClenon or any other editors have advice, I welcome their thoughts. JA1776 (talk) 04:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I look at this again this morning, there is some important and properly sourced info about the leadership of Purdue Global that has been removed by recent edits that I am going to restore. I also am going to restore the 12.5% compromise language that has been accepted on here for several months and is already a compromise. If any users disagree, I invite them to initiate a dispute resolution process because this is an issue that has been excessively discussed in the talk archives. JA1776 (talk) 14:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]