Jump to content

User talk:B9Joker108: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 68: Line 68:
You have added material to multiple articles (which could be considered [[WP:SPAM|spamming]]) sourced to a 2016 book by Rosen. However, the ISBN is invalid and a search by title does not yield any result on Amazon, Google Books, or Worldcat. Unless you can show the existence of this source, please stop using it. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 12:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
You have added material to multiple articles (which could be considered [[WP:SPAM|spamming]]) sourced to a 2016 book by Rosen. However, the ISBN is invalid and a search by title does not yield any result on Amazon, Google Books, or Worldcat. Unless you can show the existence of this source, please stop using it. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 12:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


:I have to apologise. I am using a new browser Bing, and particularly the new AI ChatBot nested within it. I have just found out definitively that the Bing ChatBot is VERY creative with the truth and manufactures sources and quotations from information it finds on the Internet. Thank you for removing the information I rewrote from my research on the Bing Intelligent Browser AI ChatBot snd placed in a number of sites. I didn't mean to spam either, I was just trying to make the articles better. You were correct, the source WAS fabricated, but I didn't do it intentionally. I am a bit disheartened as I have been writing a whole draft article on the Vishnu Yamala that is essentially a construct, a fabrication, a spurious work of fiction. Technology is both a blessing and curse. [[User:B9Joker108|B9Joker108]] ([[User talk:B9Joker108#top|talk]]) 02:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
:I have to apologise. I am using a new browser Bing, and particularly the new AI ChatBot nested within it. I have just found out definitively that the Bing ChatBot is VERY creative with the truth and manufactures sources and quotations from information it finds on the Internet. Thank you for removing the information I rewrote from my research on the Bing Intelligent Browser AI ChatBot and placed in a number of sites. I didn't mean to spam either, I was just trying to make the articles better. You were correct, the source WAS fabricated, but I didn't do it intentionally. I am a bit disheartened as I have been writing a whole draft article on the Vishnu Yamala that is essentially a construct, a fabrication, a spurious work of fiction. Technology is both a blessing and curse. [[User:B9Joker108|B9Joker108]] ([[User talk:B9Joker108#top|talk]]) 02:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:49, 30 September 2023

Turning the sod of my talk page

This is my talk page and I am posting this to nake it a living page! Testing, testing...B9Joker108 (talk) 23:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, B9Joker108!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
I wanted in particular to call your attention to the guide to referencing for new users. I saw you putting in what I assume were sources for content (thank you for doing that!), but in the form of external links directly in the body text, which we try to avoid. That guide will show you how to put things in referencing format, which is actually much easier than it looks. Thanks! AntiDionysius (talk) 00:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@AntiDionysius Thank you very much. B9Joker108 (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@AntiDionysius Thank you very much for the welcome. I have started editing an article in my sandbox.B9Joker108 (talk) 00:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fake reference?

You have added material to multiple articles (which could be considered spamming) sourced to a 2016 book by Rosen. However, the ISBN is invalid and a search by title does not yield any result on Amazon, Google Books, or Worldcat. Unless you can show the existence of this source, please stop using it. Skyerise (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have to apologise. I am using a new browser Bing, and particularly the new AI ChatBot nested within it. I have just found out definitively that the Bing ChatBot is VERY creative with the truth and manufactures sources and quotations from information it finds on the Internet. Thank you for removing the information I rewrote from my research on the Bing Intelligent Browser AI ChatBot and placed in a number of sites. I didn't mean to spam either, I was just trying to make the articles better. You were correct, the source WAS fabricated, but I didn't do it intentionally. I am a bit disheartened as I have been writing a whole draft article on the Vishnu Yamala that is essentially a construct, a fabrication, a spurious work of fiction. Technology is both a blessing and curse. B9Joker108 (talk) 02:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]