Talk:Tale of the Moon Cuckoo: Difference between revisions
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Transcluding GA review |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA|18:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)|topic=drama|page=1|oldid=1183378536}} |
|||
{{GA nominee|19:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Media and drama|status=onreview|note=|shortdesc=}} |
|||
{{WPBS |class=B |collapsed=yes |1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Opera}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Mongols|importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Literature |importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Did you know nomination== |
==Did you know nomination== |
||
Revision as of 18:16, 13 November 2023
 | Tale of the Moon Cuckoo has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 13, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 00:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- ... that each performance of the Tale of the Moon Cuckoo lasted for an entire month? Source: Ariunaa, Jarghalsaikhan (20 January 2021). "NOYON KHUTAGT DANZANRAVJAA'S THEATER". UB Post. Ulaanbaatar. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
Created by AirshipJungleman29 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Tale of the Moon Cuckoo; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Nice to see this article here, I actually came across it a couple of days ago when browsing RecentChanges! QPQ is done, hook is very interesting, article is neutral and well cited. Earwig comes up with 6.5%, and hook is cited. Passed! Frzzl talk; contribs 22:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tale of the Moon Cuckoo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Geethree (talk · contribs) 17:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 13, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Pass
Solid and coherent copy, understandable to someone unfamiliar with Mongolian history. There are extremely minor tweaks I would make (there is an over-use of commas, for example), but I will do that myself post-review.
- 2. Verifiable?: Pass
Well sourced. It is perhaps over-reliant on another third-party source (Atwood) and could be improved with more secondary sourcing. However, I think the sourcing is thorough and appropriate to pass the good article review.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
No comments. Concise and focused while providing helpful, wikilinked historical context.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Stable? Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
Great job. I enjoyed reading the article! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Geethree (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)