Jump to content

User talk:203.211.104.234: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Done what was required 6x now
No edit summary
Line 57: Line 57:


and then waffle some crap about good faith? have you read all your own messages? do this please, I do it, no now you need to do this, I did, no now you have to do this, find this, unsay this. its endless code. oh but I can't say anyone sucks or its rigged, because then you go code some clause saying I violated something you made up.
and then waffle some crap about good faith? have you read all your own messages? do this please, I do it, no now you need to do this, I did, no now you have to do this, find this, unsay this. its endless code. oh but I can't say anyone sucks or its rigged, because then you go code some clause saying I violated something you made up.
{{unblock | reason="I withdraw any and all legal threats I made" - 6th time I have said this, unblock me [[Special:Contributions/203.211.104.234|203.211.104.234]] ([[User talk:203.211.104.234#top|talk]]) 23:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)}}

{{unblock}} "I withdraw any and all legal threats I made" - 6th time I have said this, unblock me

Revision as of 23:41, 21 November 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.211.104.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

your reason here So you have no information on the page I was editing and now your going to remove factual sources that I listed, as you've stated on the page talk list and you've written some jibbirish about a "rampage" on the site yesterday?

Where do you make up these lies?

The information posted on page by me is factual data taken from real sources, they are listed.

You then decided its a conflict of interest because I volunteer for the team? the person attempting to edit the edits I made because they said "you have too much data", also has a page connected to the league, so how are they any different to me?

They aren't.

They also state "i'm not looking to get into an edit war" - cool so back up and remove your queries.

People use wikipedia to find all sorts of information. The team I volunteer for doesn't have a fancy website, it has fans all over the world who want to see stats.

Any other sporting team has all their stats and players and acheivements listed do the not?

This person is 100% butt hurt because I made factual edits.

reinstate my account, I have done nothing wrong. All this jibbbirsh talk of "rampage" and threats, what a bunch of lies. You've comment yourself saying your going to remove the edits? on what ground other than erasing factual data.

You also seems to asend to some power to block Ips and people? again on what grounds. There is no issue with the stats and data I have provided, its not a hate speech, its not racial, its simple stats for a part time basketball team in my town.

hectic yarns from a bunch of bots whom have nothing better to do than take away editing tools for genunie people like me who live in the area and support the team.


the user listed as DaHuzyBru lives in a difffernt country and has a proffesional sports blog, and your telling me I have a conflict of interest. just wow.

Decline reason:

This IP is blocked for making legal threats, but you don't discuss that in this request. See WP:NLT. You can pursue your grievances in the courts of your country or on Wikipedia, but not both. To be unblocked, you will need to withdraw any and all legal threats. 331dot (talk) 01:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.211.104.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

why am I being blocked by a bunch of people that have no idea on any of these topics? 203.211.104.234 (talk) 02:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for legal threats. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 03:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Prior declined requests may not be removed until the block is removed, per WP:BLANKING. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read Wikipedia:No legal threats - you are accused of making a legal threat. In your next unblock request, you should either deny this, or admit it, and retract the legal threat. PhilKnight (talk) 03:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did retract them, then you readded them, but thats cool you change the rules to suit yourself. 203.211.104.234 (talk) 04:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So you just work on your own time there bud?
You've asked for the remarks to be retracted, I did so, then you re added them, so now what? like I said, your making up the rules as you go.
retract them - I did, you replaced what I retracted...how does that solve the issue? it doesn't, because you just want a user blocked. admit it. and you'll just ignore me so I stayed blocked. 203.211.104.234 (talk) 05:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Retract" the threats does not mean remove them, it means make a new statement to the effect of "I withdraw any and all legal threats I made". 331dot (talk) 10:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
where do I make this statement then, again, if you actually explained yourseleves instead of just thinking someone knows this made up process it would have been over already wouldn't actualdiksmokers.
So "I retract any statments that I have made that people seem to feel are a threat to them, which I have never actually made, but for the sake ive being able to edit a page on wiki, go for your life and retract the statment".
whatever floats your boat - the claim about a threat is false to start with, but as you asked, I offer to retract such statment. 203.211.104.234 (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You told someone you would go to the police, that is a legal threat. We cannot stop you from going to the police, but then you may not edit Wikipedia until the conclusion of the legal case that opens up. You must unequivocally withdraw the threat, your above statement is insufficient. You'll also need to adopt a more civil attitude. 331dot (talk) 13:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
a more civil attitude? so thats a made up rule you've decided yourself again is it?
I retract the statment made about "going to the police", on whatever grounds it suits the bot user / editor at the time that makes up the rules as they go along, no doubt though, the next person to read this will make up another rule, about tone, or something that has nothing to do with the issue in the first place".
I'd love to know when the actual issue of some random person simply saying the team page I edited according to them "your team has done nothing in 4 years so why are you doing so many edits". is actually looked into.
rather than, you guys dragging this out. I was asked to retract - I've stated that 3 times. I went and also retracted the comment from the internet, thats called retracting and then another user decided to put it back on and cited that I haven't done what he or she said...so you just make up the rules.
even if I state here for a 5th time "I retract my comment about the police" all you have to do is delete this message.
unblock my account - I'm simply trying to keep a small sports team page relevant so people can read about us. how hard. 203.211.104.234 (talk) 20:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.211.104.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I Have read them, I went and removed these so called threats you make up, and now you've gone and readded them, so even when I do follow your instructions I still can't get unblocked your basically changing the rules as you go, I retracted whatever it is that has apparently upset you. Unblock me as the your suggestion states 203.211.104.234 (talk) 04:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your combativeness and inability to assume good faith speak for themselves as to why you will not be unblocked anytime soon. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


here we go, so I follow the instructions and now your changing the rules to suit yoursleves, change your names or users, some rando chips in about nothing like this guy here now talking about "good faith" so its an endless chain of being blocked?

you asked me to retract the statment - I did, you readd it. I make a comment about retracting it as asked, now your saying I'm being combative?

all because I edited a page. You actual people need to get a life aye, can't do something in the real world, so come to virtual word and someone does something that is factal, na you just make up the rules as you go? Then I get told all this jibbirish talk about being abusive and combatative? Just another reason why the world is broken.

So you'd rather have some guy come in and argue my edits - which are all factual and have sources, and agree with him, based on what? drive me to insanity then play the abuse card?

and then waffle some crap about good faith? have you read all your own messages? do this please, I do it, no now you need to do this, I did, no now you have to do this, find this, unsay this. its endless code. oh but I can't say anyone sucks or its rigged, because then you go code some clause saying I violated something you made up.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

203.211.104.234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"I withdraw any and all legal threats I made" - 6th time I have said this, unblock me 203.211.104.234 (talk) 23:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2="I withdraw any and all legal threats I made" - 6th time I have said this, unblock me [[Special:Contributions/203.211.104.234|203.211.104.234]] ([[User talk:203.211.104.234#top|talk]]) 23:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1="I withdraw any and all legal threats I made" - 6th time I have said this, unblock me [[Special:Contributions/203.211.104.234|203.211.104.234]] ([[User talk:203.211.104.234#top|talk]]) 23:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1="I withdraw any and all legal threats I made" - 6th time I have said this, unblock me [[Special:Contributions/203.211.104.234|203.211.104.234]] ([[User talk:203.211.104.234#top|talk]]) 23:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}