Jump to content

User talk:Dr Lisboa: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Decline unblock
Dr Lisboa (talk | contribs)
unblock
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock reviewed|1=the sole reason given for sock puppetry claims is reverting deletions of sections of the Jesus article. yet all those editors who repeatedly deleted the section have not been questioned or criticised. There is obvious religious bias from the Administrator that has blocked everybody that opposes the deletions. He has not blocked or even warned all of those people that repeatedly did the deleting of the section. Double standards are being applied based on religious bias|decline=Confirmed abusive sockpuppeteer, see [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr Lisboa]]. — [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 15:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=the sole reason given for sock puppetry claims is reverting deletions of sections of the Jesus article. yet all those editors who repeatedly deleted the section have not been questioned or criticised. There is obvious religious bias from the Administrator that has blocked everybody that opposes the deletions. He has not blocked or even warned all of those people that repeatedly did the deleting of the section. Double standards are being applied based on religious bias|decline=Confirmed abusive sockpuppeteer, see [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dr Lisboa]]. — [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] 15:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)}}


{{unblock|Yamla has completely failed to provide any evidence that opposes what I have written. Are the standards of these assessmenst so low that evidence and explanations are never provided ? Can an Admninistrator that actually knows how to do the job look at this.}}

Revision as of 16:48, 30 March 2007

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Lisboa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

the sole reason given for sock puppetry claims is reverting deletions of sections of the Jesus article. yet all those editors who repeatedly deleted the section have not been questioned or criticised. There is obvious religious bias from the Administrator that has blocked everybody that opposes the deletions. He has not blocked or even warned all of those people that repeatedly did the deleting of the section. Double standards are being applied based on religious bias

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Dr Lisboa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yamla has completely failed to provide any evidence that opposes what I have written. Are the standards of these assessmenst so low that evidence and explanations are never provided ? Can an Admninistrator that actually knows how to do the job look at this.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Yamla has completely failed to provide any evidence that opposes what I have written. Are the standards of these assessmenst so low that evidence and explanations are never provided ? Can an Admninistrator that actually knows how to do the job look at this. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yamla has completely failed to provide any evidence that opposes what I have written. Are the standards of these assessmenst so low that evidence and explanations are never provided ? Can an Admninistrator that actually knows how to do the job look at this. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yamla has completely failed to provide any evidence that opposes what I have written. Are the standards of these assessmenst so low that evidence and explanations are never provided ? Can an Admninistrator that actually knows how to do the job look at this. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}