Jump to content

User talk:Double sharp: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 19: Line 19:
Hi there. After a long break, I am back at chemistry articles :) Currently working on [[vanadium]] in Turkish. I was checking the data on the [[abundance of elements in Earth's crust]] article, and I found a source saying that the abundance of vanadium is 0.019% of the Earth's crust and that puts the element on the 18th place ("The potentiality of vanadium in medicinal applications", Dieter Rehder). But the article doesn't mention any source for that value. Do you think we should mention on that? Or should we ignore? [[User:Nanahuatl|Nanahuatl]] ([[User talk:Nanahuatl|talk]]) 02:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there. After a long break, I am back at chemistry articles :) Currently working on [[vanadium]] in Turkish. I was checking the data on the [[abundance of elements in Earth's crust]] article, and I found a source saying that the abundance of vanadium is 0.019% of the Earth's crust and that puts the element on the 18th place ("The potentiality of vanadium in medicinal applications", Dieter Rehder). But the article doesn't mention any source for that value. Do you think we should mention on that? Or should we ignore? [[User:Nanahuatl|Nanahuatl]] ([[User talk:Nanahuatl|talk]]) 02:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
:{{ping|Nanahuatl}} WebElements agrees that vanadium is 18th, but not CRC. That said, I suspect uncertainties are large enough that one cannot really give an exact number. [[User:Double sharp|Double sharp]] ([[User talk:Double sharp#top|talk]]) 04:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
:{{ping|Nanahuatl}} WebElements agrees that vanadium is 18th, but not CRC. That said, I suspect uncertainties are large enough that one cannot really give an exact number. [[User:Double sharp|Double sharp]] ([[User talk:Double sharp#top|talk]]) 04:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
::Is it a reliable source? [[User:Nanahuatl|Nanahuatl]] ([[User talk:Nanahuatl|talk]]) 04:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:29, 20 December 2023

Nomination for deletion of Template:Alkaline earth metals

Template:Alkaline earth metals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Centaur (fairy chess piece) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 10 § Centaur (fairy chess piece) until a consensus is reached. Best, user:A smart kittenmeow 21:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Frankland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vanadium

Hi there. After a long break, I am back at chemistry articles :) Currently working on vanadium in Turkish. I was checking the data on the abundance of elements in Earth's crust article, and I found a source saying that the abundance of vanadium is 0.019% of the Earth's crust and that puts the element on the 18th place ("The potentiality of vanadium in medicinal applications", Dieter Rehder). But the article doesn't mention any source for that value. Do you think we should mention on that? Or should we ignore? Nanahuatl (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nanahuatl: WebElements agrees that vanadium is 18th, but not CRC. That said, I suspect uncertainties are large enough that one cannot really give an exact number. Double sharp (talk) 04:07, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is it a reliable source? Nanahuatl (talk) 04:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]