Talk:DNA sequencing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:38, 30 December 2023

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB / COMPBIO C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Neuroscience C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DNA sequencing received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

THE REPLICATION AND DETERMINATION OF DNA IN ITS RAW FORM.

If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same.

some history for you Noobs

back in 2007 or there bouts, a person called cinnamon colbert complained that the human genome hadn't actually been sequenced and this guy was mocked and jeered and reverted well, today Nature , one of the most prestiqous scientific journals in the entire world, says, quote seeems like you all owe colbert a big apology quote Fully finished genomes Roughly one-tenth of the human genome remained uncharted when genomics researchers Karen Miga at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and Adam Phillippy at the National Human Genome Research Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, launched the Telomere-to-Telomere (T2T) consortium in 2019. Now, that number has dropped to zero. In a preprint published in May last year, the consortium reported the first end-to-end sequence of the human genome, adding nearly 200 million new base pairs to the widely used human consensus genome sequence known as GRCh38, and writing the final chapter of the Human Genome Project1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.105 (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also, see the abstract to this article https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.24.497523v1

you people are so out of touch — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:192:4700:1F70:BCF8:D4F8:4FBA:FBA1 (talk) 13:09, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

table of robots in sample prep is spam for opentrons

yess the opentrons is much cheaper, but it is is much harder to program so you have to pay a lot of money for programming and it is very limited this table reads like an advert for opentrons and also this is wikipedia why do we need this table at all ?????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:192:4700:1F70:3C07:FF83:6CC9:713 (talk) 13:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Media

Adding images to the different ways of sequencing DNA could really help with understanding how they work. EliasMari (talk) 03:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Zoology

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2023 and 30 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nanalpr (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Nanalpr (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

complaint

this section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing#Microscopy-based_techniques

is sort of clickbaitish: this is a dead method that has never actually worked very well if at all yet posters keep pumping it (not, IMO, hyperbole) editors, can't we do something about this ???