Jump to content

Talk:1945 Oklahoma A&M Cowboys football team: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
my .02
Line 7: Line 7:
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1945_Oklahoma_A%26M_Cowboys_football_team&type=revision&diff=919413555&oldid=915685865 This edit] restored content (including four unsourced bullets) and lacked an [[:WP:Edit Summary]] for context. The unsourced content in bulleted format does not read well. As such as I have reverted to the immediate prior version. I have no objection to potential return of this content, but the specific claims should be sourced and likely presented as prose rather than a one-off bullet list. [[User:UW Dawgs|UW Dawgs]] ([[User talk:UW Dawgs|talk]]) 22:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1945_Oklahoma_A%26M_Cowboys_football_team&type=revision&diff=919413555&oldid=915685865 This edit] restored content (including four unsourced bullets) and lacked an [[:WP:Edit Summary]] for context. The unsourced content in bulleted format does not read well. As such as I have reverted to the immediate prior version. I have no objection to potential return of this content, but the specific claims should be sourced and likely presented as prose rather than a one-off bullet list. [[User:UW Dawgs|UW Dawgs]] ([[User talk:UW Dawgs|talk]]) 22:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
:I have an issue with the content because it's tone seems as if it is arguing that OSU doesn't deserve a claim for the national title. While I personally don't think the title is legitimate, it is also not my place to place mine or anybody else's [[WP:NPOV|point of view]] in the article. While many national title claims are [[1941 Alabama Crimson Tide football team|dubious]], wikipedia articles are not the place to argue which team was better.-[[User:UCO2009bluejay|UCO2009bluejay]] ([[User talk:UCO2009bluejay|talk]]) 01:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
:I have an issue with the content because it's tone seems as if it is arguing that OSU doesn't deserve a claim for the national title. While I personally don't think the title is legitimate, it is also not my place to place mine or anybody else's [[WP:NPOV|point of view]] in the article. While many national title claims are [[1941 Alabama Crimson Tide football team|dubious]], wikipedia articles are not the place to argue which team was better.-[[User:UCO2009bluejay|UCO2009bluejay]] ([[User talk:UCO2009bluejay|talk]]) 01:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

== Unneeded information about Army. ==

The wikipedia page is clearly about Oklahoma A&M, yet users such as Jeff in CA feel the need to obsessively add in info about Army's team in a poor attempt to attack Oklahoma State's championship claim. [[Special:Contributions/2600:8804:586:3D00:D73B:C0F3:B71A:47E3|2600:8804:586:3D00:D73B:C0F3:B71A:47E3]] ([[User talk:2600:8804:586:3D00:D73B:C0F3:B71A:47E3|talk]]) 19:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:58, 8 January 2024

WikiProject iconCollege football Stub‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Restoration of unsourced content

@UCO2009bluejay and Mack2700:

This edit restored content (including four unsourced bullets) and lacked an WP:Edit Summary for context. The unsourced content in bulleted format does not read well. As such as I have reverted to the immediate prior version. I have no objection to potential return of this content, but the specific claims should be sourced and likely presented as prose rather than a one-off bullet list. UW Dawgs (talk) 22:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have an issue with the content because it's tone seems as if it is arguing that OSU doesn't deserve a claim for the national title. While I personally don't think the title is legitimate, it is also not my place to place mine or anybody else's point of view in the article. While many national title claims are dubious, wikipedia articles are not the place to argue which team was better.-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 01:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded information about Army.

The wikipedia page is clearly about Oklahoma A&M, yet users such as Jeff in CA feel the need to obsessively add in info about Army's team in a poor attempt to attack Oklahoma State's championship claim. 2600:8804:586:3D00:D73B:C0F3:B71A:47E3 (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]