Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Evans: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:34, 10 January 2024

Michele Evans

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded by Escape Orbit as "Self published author, fails notability. Article reads like an autobiography focused on linking to Amazon and Barns and Noble self-published books". Prod removed without explanation here, but like EO I can find no evidence of notability. I don't think any of the sources in the article currently contribute to GNG: they're either by Evans, do not discuss her in depth, or "rumors/gossip". Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 10:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 10:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the history, the like links were added when the inclusion of the description of the book was contested and were put in place to allow the reader to view them from their origin.

I'm really surprised at the hate Michele is receiving. She is not just an author so deleting based on self publishing assertions fall flat.

Must I provide example after example of articles on wikipedia that have less documentation?

It is my position you are targeting Michele because of her situation with Sharpe. Which by the way, article after article could be sourced providing these indepth sources which are claimed to be missing.

This article reads as it does because no discussion on Michele is allowed and anything thing not sterile is swiftly deleted. 69.117.93.145 (talk) 10:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Prodded by {{u|Escape Orbit}} as "Self published author, fails notability.  Article reads like an autobiography focused on linking to Amazon and Barns and Noble self-published  books". Prod removed without explanation [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michele_Evans&diff=prev&oldid=1194709470 here], but like EO I can find no evidence of notability.  I don't think any of the sources in the article currently contribute to GNG: they're either by Evans, do not discuss her in depth, or [https://tmspn.com/shannon-sharpes-ex-lover-michele-evans-allegedly-has-active-defamation-suit-against-shannon-sharpe/ "rumors/gossip"]. [[User:Caeciliusinhorto-public|Caeciliusinhorto-public]] ([[User talk:Caeciliusinhorto-public|talk]]) 10:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Authors|list of Authors-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Caeciliusinhorto-public|Caeciliusinhorto-public]] ([[User talk:Caeciliusinhorto-public|talk]]) 10:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)</small>
+:If you look at the history, the like links were added when the inclusion of the description of the book was contested and were put in place to allow the reader to view them from their origin.
+:I'm really surprised at the hate Michele is receiving.  She is not just an author so deleting based on self publishing assertions fall flat.
+:Must I provide example after example of articles on wikipedia that have less documentation?
+:It is my position you are targeting Michele because of her situation with Sharpe.  Which by the way, article after article could be sourced providing these indepth sources which are claimed to be missing.
+:This article reads as it does because no discussion on Michele is allowed and anything thing not sterile is swiftly deleted. [[Special:Contributions/69.117.93.145|69.117.93.145]] ([[User talk:69.117.93.145|talk]]) 10:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)