Talk:The Antioch Review: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:03, 14 January 2024

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

United States: Ohio Stub‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

To the editors: This article links to the wrong George Geiger. The correct George Geiger was an eminent philosophy professor at Antioch College, and his biography can be found here: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3487871?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.95.172 (talk) 22:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article Needs Clarification of Fogarty's Dismissal As Editor, and the Review's Hiatus

There are puzzling aspects to Fogarty's dismissal as editor, and The Antioch Review being put on hiatus. The excuse Antioch College gave was that there were financial problems in continuing to publish. However, as recently as five years ago, Fogarty told contributors (including me) that the review had secure endowments and would not experience any shortage of funds. Where did this money go? Also, it was Fogarty who built the review into a world-class publication. Why would he be threatened with legal proceedings when he struggled to continue the publication? Why would he be stonewalled when he asked the college about the review's future? Why would he be essentially fired, with so little ceremony or excuse? What about the alleged public controversy, between staffers Cynthia Dunlevy and Managing Editor Ben Zitsman, about Zitsman possibly overstepping his role? Frankly, these were messy situations which the article does nothing to elucidate. Younggoldchip (talk) 16:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 == Article Needs Clarification of Fogarty's Dismissal As Editor, and the Review's Hiatus ==
-There are puzzling aspects to Fogarty's dismissal as editor, and The Antioch Review being put on hiatus. The excuse Antioch College gave was that there were financial problems in continuing to publish. However, as recently as five years ago, Fogarty told contributors (including me) that the review had secure endowments and would not experience any shortage of funds. Where did this money go? Also, it was Fogarty who built the review into a world-class publication. Why would he be threatened with legal proceedings when he struggled to continue the publication? Why would he be essentially fired, with so little ceremony or excuse? What about the alleged public controversy, between staffers Cynthia Dunlevy and Ben Zitsman, about Zitsman possibly overstepping his role?  Frankly, these were messy situations which the article does nothing to elucidate.
+There are puzzling aspects to Fogarty's dismissal as editor, and The Antioch Review being put on hiatus. The excuse Antioch College gave was that there were financial problems in continuing to publish. However, as recently as five years ago, Fogarty told contributors (including me) that the review had secure endowments and would not experience any shortage of funds. Where did this money go? Also, it was Fogarty who built the review into a world-class publication. Why would he be threatened with legal proceedings when he struggled to continue the publication? Why would he be stonewalled when he asked the college about the review's future? Why would he be essentially fired, with so little ceremony or excuse? What about the alleged public controversy, between staffers Cynthia Dunlevy and Managing Editor Ben Zitsman, about Zitsman possibly overstepping his role?  Frankly, these were messy situations which the article does nothing to elucidate.
 [[User:Younggoldchip|Younggoldchip]] ([[User talk:Younggoldchip|talk]]) 16:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)