Talk:Effects of the Chernobyl disaster: Difference between revisions
added GA assessment and summary ~~~~ |
forgot to sign the assessment summary. added it with this edit. ~~~~ |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Assessment Summary = |
= Assessment Summary = |
||
The article itself meets the various requirements of a good article. I'd like to seem some more in-article references, but otherwise, its ok. I cna agree in some respects with the comments listed below. However, my assessment is derived from the article as presented, not where it might be merged or what it is duplicative of. |
The article itself meets the various requirements of a good article. I'd like to seem some more in-article references, but otherwise, its ok. I cna agree in some respects with the comments listed below. However, my assessment is derived from the article as presented, not where it might be merged or what it is duplicative of. [[User:SkipperClipper|SkipperClipper]] 02:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
=Comments= |
=Comments= |
||
Revision as of 02:06, 2 April 2007
 | Effects of the Chernobyl disaster has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{GA|insert date in any format here}}. |
Assessment Summary
The article itself meets the various requirements of a good article. I'd like to seem some more in-article references, but otherwise, its ok. I cna agree in some respects with the comments listed below. However, my assessment is derived from the article as presented, not where it might be merged or what it is duplicative of. SkipperClipper 02:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
I do not think this topic should exist both here and on the Chernobyl disaster page.
Either the entire article should be moved from the main page to here, leaving only the link, or this page should be removed leaving the topic on the main page.
Linking out while the topic remains on the main page leaves two pages to be updated by editors and a comparison between the two shows that the main page is being updated far more frequently than this one. BRT01 02:11, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Red Forest
I think there should be a section or Whole page to the Red Forest. Right now 'Red Forest' redirects Chernobyl disaster effects. I would like to help on the new section or pageMax 16:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)