Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ocient (company): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Delete |
→Ocient (company): Reply |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:*[https://www.iit.edu/computing/research/research-centers The IIT] listing is a short company profile, no in-depth information and relies entirely on information provided by the company, fails ORGIND. |
:*[https://www.iit.edu/computing/research/research-centers The IIT] listing is a short company profile, no in-depth information and relies entirely on information provided by the company, fails ORGIND. |
||
:I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. [[User:HighKing|<b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family: Courier; color: #da0000;">++ </span>]]</sup> 21:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
:I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. [[User:HighKing|<b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:HighKing|<span style="font-family: Courier; color: #da0000;">++ </span>]]</sup> 21:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks for your time and review. Because you're looking for more "independent" content, how about being included in this tech analysis: https://mattturck.com/mad2023/ or this independent write through: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/thanks-trillion-hyperscale-data-warehousing-takes-flight-kavanagh-pewie/ [[Special:Contributions/73.211.222.32|73.211.222.32]] ([[User talk:73.211.222.32|talk]]) 21:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:37, 22 January 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ocient (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Publications are not properly focused on the company, neither they are reliable enough to grant meeting NCORP criteria Gavrover (talk) 11:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Illinois. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 13:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – seems like it's based on press releases. TLA (talk) 04:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback. The information from the page is from earned coverage in several unpaid articles. I'm also happy to explain more on context if helpful.
- https://venturebeat.com/data-infrastructure/ocient-scales-hyperscale-data-warehouse-for-machine-learning/
- https://www.datanami.com/2023/03/10/hyperscale-analytics-growing-faster-than-expected-ocient-says/
- https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/startups/how-startups-grow-their-business-on-googles-open-data-cloud
- https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/blue-sky/ct-chris-gladwin-ocient-startup-bsi-20160726-story.html 73.211.222.32 (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Here is a link solely focused on Ocient https://thenewstack.io/ocient-makes-the-case-for-coupling-storage-and-compute/ 73.211.222.32 (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)- Here is a good post from tech journalist Chris Mellor that is unpaid and noteworthy. https://blocksandfiles.com/2022/07/01/ocient-hyperscale-data-analysis/ 73.211.222.32 (talk) 20:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- The Ocient Computational Center could also be added. It's at Illinois Tech. https://www.iit.edu/computing/research/research-centers 73.211.222.32 (talk) 21:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Analysis of the source posted above:
- Venturebeat article relies entirely on announcements from the company and interviews/quotes from their execs with no "Independent Content" as per ORGIND.
- DataAMI article suffers the same flaws. Fails ORGIND.
- Google is a partner company, not independent, fails ORGIND.
- Chicago Tribune relies entirely on an interview with the founder, fails ORGIND
- The New Stack article relies entirely on info provided by the company and their execs and has no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND.
- Blocks and Files article suffers the same way. Fails ORGIND.
- The IIT listing is a short company profile, no in-depth information and relies entirely on information provided by the company, fails ORGIND.
- I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 21:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your time and review. Because you're looking for more "independent" content, how about being included in this tech analysis: https://mattturck.com/mad2023/ or this independent write through: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/thanks-trillion-hyperscale-data-warehousing-takes-flight-kavanagh-pewie/ 73.211.222.32 (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)