Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dorothy Anstett: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:52, 10 February 2024

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2024 at 13:52:46 (UTC)

Reason: high quality picture used as lead image, notable photographer
Articles in which this image appears: Dorothy Anstett, Miss USA 1968, List of Miss USA titleholders
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Bernard Gotfryd, restored and uploaded by Yann

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — A 55-year-old promotional glam pic. Target bio at 155 words is a stub, with nothing about subject's notability other than her three-year marriage to Bill Russell half a century ago. (Subject now 76.) Scant visual interest. Lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 14:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Scant visual interest" for a model and a Miss USA. I will take that as ironic... Yann (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just another pretty fem. Not notable. -- Sca (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you thin she's not notable, than WP:AFD is that way. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think she's notable? For what? -- Sca (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Conditional~~ Support Lead image of a couple articles. I might not be interested in Miss America, but it certainly passes the General Notability Guideline many times over. That said, there are a few obvious dark blotches on her face and neck that clearly aren't meant to be there, like the one on her left cheek (right as you're looking at it), and some less intrusive ones on other bits of skin. Can you do a quick secondary pass? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 01:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OOPS, how did I miss that? I think I uploaded the wrong version. Thanks for spotting that. Fixed. Yann (talk) 11:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All good now. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 16:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - High quality portrait and an interesting glimpse of the past. Moonreach (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
*Oppose @ Yann i would be careful when editing old film pics. Anycase 2nd version made by GRuban is best here. While new edit is trying to "correct" film colors to digital, and is grevious mistake. Please make renomination in seperate and revert to 2nd option of GRuban. --Petar Milošević (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 :*:All good now. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup><sub>Has about 8.8% of all [[WP:FP|FPs]].</sub></span> 16:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' - High quality portrait and an interesting glimpse of the past. [[User:Moonreach|Moonreach]] ([[User talk:Moonreach|talk]]) 15:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
+* *'''Oppose''' @ [[User:Yann|Yann]] i would be careful when editing old film pics. Anycase [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/a/a4/20240127215314%21Dorothy_Anstett%2C_Miss_USA%2C_1968.jpg 2nd version] made by GRuban is best here. While new edit is trying to "correct" film colors to digital, and is grevious mistake. Please make renomination in seperate and revert to 2nd option of GRuban. --[[User:PetarM|Petar Milošević]] ([[User talk:PetarM|talk]]) 14:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 <!-- additional votes go above this line  -->