Talk:Visegrád 24: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:49, 11 February 2024

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Poland C‑class Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Journalism C‑class Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Social media sites aren't reliable references and shouldn't be in references - can you remove those? Thanks.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I made some edits to the page because there was a warning that the content was unverified and biased. it shows as a total change because my browser didn't let me publish, so I had to copy and paste my work through tabs. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penini S (talk • contribs) 13:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd say this article is highly biased and reliant on sources that are themselves not reliable / unbiased. NPOV etc problems. KenThomas (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Equally, not sure this is a notable article. KenThomas (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:49, 11 February 2024 edit KenThomas (talk \| contribs) 386 edits →‎Feedback from New Page Review process: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:49, 11 February 2024 edit undo KenThomas (talk \| contribs) 386 edits →‎Feedback from New Page Review process: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:Yes, I'd say this article is highly biased and reliant on sources that are themselves not reliable / unbiased. NPOV etc problems. [[User:KenThomas\|KenThomas]] ([[User talk:KenThomas\|talk]]) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)		:Yes, I'd say this article is highly biased and reliant on sources that are themselves not reliable / unbiased. NPOV etc problems. [[User:KenThomas\|KenThomas]] ([[User talk:KenThomas\|talk]]) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
			::Equally, not sure this is a ''notable'' article. [[User:KenThomas\|KenThomas]] ([[User talk:KenThomas\|talk]]) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)