Talk:Visegrád 24: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Yes, I'd say this article is highly biased and reliant on sources that are themselves not reliable / unbiased. NPOV etc problems. [[User:KenThomas|KenThomas]] ([[User talk:KenThomas|talk]]) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC) |
:Yes, I'd say this article is highly biased and reliant on sources that are themselves not reliable / unbiased. NPOV etc problems. [[User:KenThomas|KenThomas]] ([[User talk:KenThomas|talk]]) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Equally, not sure this is a ''notable'' article. [[User:KenThomas|KenThomas]] ([[User talk:KenThomas|talk]]) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:49, 11 February 2024
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Social media sites aren't reliable references and shouldn't be in references - can you remove those? Thanks.
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey! I made some edits to the page because there was a warning that the content was unverified and biased. it shows as a total change because my browser didn't let me publish, so I had to copy and paste my work through tabs. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penini S (talk • contribs) 13:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd say this article is highly biased and reliant on sources that are themselves not reliable / unbiased. NPOV etc problems. KenThomas (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Equally, not sure this is a notable article. KenThomas (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)