Local uniformization: Difference between revisions
m Open access bot: doi added to citation with #oabot. |
#suggestededit-add-desc 1.0 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Concept related to resolving singularities in algebraic geometry}} |
|||
In algebraic geometry, '''local uniformization''' is a weak form of [[resolution of singularities]], stating roughly that a variety can be desingularized near any valuation, or in other words that the [[Zariski–Riemann space]] of the variety is in some sense nonsingular. Local uniformization was introduced by {{harvs|txt|last=Zariski|year1=1939|year2=1940}}, who separated out the problem of resolving the singularities of a variety into the problem of local uniformization and the problem of combining the local uniformizations into a global desingularization. |
In algebraic geometry, '''local uniformization''' is a weak form of [[resolution of singularities]], stating roughly that a variety can be desingularized near any valuation, or in other words that the [[Zariski–Riemann space]] of the variety is in some sense nonsingular. Local uniformization was introduced by {{harvs|txt|last=Zariski|year1=1939|year2=1940}}, who separated out the problem of resolving the singularities of a variety into the problem of local uniformization and the problem of combining the local uniformizations into a global desingularization. |
||
Revision as of 04:24, 13 February 2024
In algebraic geometry, local uniformization is a weak form of resolution of singularities, stating roughly that a variety can be desingularized near any valuation, or in other words that the Zariski–Riemann space of the variety is in some sense nonsingular. Local uniformization was introduced by Zariski (1939, 1940), who separated out the problem of resolving the singularities of a variety into the problem of local uniformization and the problem of combining the local uniformizations into a global desingularization.
Local uniformization of a variety at a valuation of its function field means finding a projective model of the variety such that the center of the valuation is non-singular. This is weaker than resolution of singularities: if there is a resolution of singularities then this is a model such that the center of every valuation is non-singular. Zariski (1944b) proved that if one can show local uniformization of a variety then one can find a finite number of models such that every valuation has a non-singular center on at least one of these models. To complete a proof of resolution of singularities it is then sufficient to show that one can combine these finite models into a single model, but this seems rather hard. (Local uniformization at a valuation does not directly imply resolution at the center of the valuation: roughly speaking; it only implies resolution in a sort of "wedge" near this point, and it seems hard to combine the resolutions of different wedges into a resolution at a point.)
Zariski (1940) proved local uniformization of varieties in any dimension over fields of characteristic 0, and used this to prove resolution of singularities for varieties in characteristic 0 of dimension at most 3. Local uniformization in positive characteristic seems to be much harder. Abhyankar (1956, 1966) proved local uniformization in all characteristic for surfaces and in characteristics at least 7 for 3-folds, and was able to deduce global resolution of singularities in these cases from this. Cutkosky (2009) simplified Abhyankar's long proof. Cossart and Piltant (2008, 2009) extended Abhyankar's proof of local uniformization of 3-folds to the remaining characteristics 2, 3, and 5. Temkin (2013) showed that it is possible to find a local uniformization of any valuation after taking a purely inseparable extension of the function field.
Local uniformization in positive characteristic for varieties of dimension at least 4 is (as of 2019) an open problem.
References
- Abhyankar, Shreeram (1956), "Local uniformization on algebraic surfaces over ground fields of characteristic p≠0", Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, 63 (3): 491–526, doi:10.2307/1970014, JSTOR 1970014, MR 0078017
- Abhyankar, Shreeram S. (1966), Resolution of singularities of embedded algebraic surfaces, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Acad. Press, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03580-1, ISBN 3-540-63719-2 (1998 2nd edition)
- Cossart, Vincent; Piltant, Olivier (2008), "Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic. I. Reduction to local uniformization on Artin–Schreier and purely inseparable coverings", Journal of Algebra, 320 (3): 1051–1082, doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.03.032, MR 2427629
- Cossart, Vincent; Piltant, Olivier (2009), "Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic. II" (PDF), Journal of Algebra, 321 (7): 1836–1976, doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.11.030, MR 2494751
- Cutkosky, Steven Dale (2009), "Resolution of singularities for 3-folds in positive characteristic", Amer. J. Math., 131 (1): 59–127, arXiv:math/0606530, doi:10.1353/ajm.0.0036, JSTOR 40068184, MR 2488485, S2CID 2139305
- Temkin, Michael (2013), "Inseparable local uniformization", J. Algebra, 373: 65–119, arXiv:0804.1554, doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.09.023, MR 2995017, S2CID 115167009
- Zariski, Oscar (1939), "The reduction of the singularities of an algebraic surface", Ann. of Math., 2, 40 (3): 639–689, doi:10.2307/1968949, JSTOR 1968949
- Zariski, Oscar (1940), "Local uniformization on algebraic varieties", Ann. of Math., 2, 41 (4): 852–896, doi:10.2307/1968864, JSTOR 1968864, MR 0002864
- Zariski, Oscar (1944a), "The compactness of the Riemann manifold of an abstract field of algebraic functions", Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 50 (10): 683–691, doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1944-08206-2, ISSN 0002-9904, MR 0011573
- Zariski, Oscar (1944b), "Reduction of the singularities of algebraic three dimensional varieties", Ann. of Math., 2, 45 (3): 472–542, doi:10.2307/1969189, JSTOR 1969189, MR 0011006
External links
- "Local uniformization", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]