Talk:Intellectual humility: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:13, 18 February 2024

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A hilarious irony

After reviewing this article, I have concluded that it features language which is overly technical, and even pompous. In light of recent and massive additions, it occurs to me that this may have been a subtle and purposeful irony. If this is indeed the case, I would like to applaud the responsible party for their creativity. However, the article must nevertheless be brought back in line with the Manual of Style (MOS). I am leaving here a link to the relevant guideline. Atomic putty? Rien! (talk) (talk) 14:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Starting page clean-up

I'll be working to clean this page up by bringing it "in line" with the MoS and bring it up todate.

Please let me know if you have any suggestions or have anything to add. RationalAndOptimistic (talk) 22:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 After reviewing this article, I have concluded that it features language which is overly technical, and even pompous. In light of recent and massive additions, it occurs to me that this may have been a subtle and purposeful irony. If this is indeed the case, I would like to applaud the responsible party for their creativity. However, the article must nevertheless be brought back in line with the [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style|Manual of Style (MOS).]] I am leaving here a link to the relevant [[Wikipedia:Make_technical_articles_understandable|guideline]].  [[User:Atomic putty? Rien!|Atomic putty? Rien! (talk) ]] ([[User talk:Atomic putty? Rien!|talk]]) 14:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
+== Starting page clean-up ==
+I'll be working to clean this page up by bringing it "in line" with the MoS and bring it up todate.
+Please let me know if you have any suggestions or have anything to add. [[User:RationalAndOptimistic|RationalAndOptimistic]] ([[User talk:RationalAndOptimistic|talk]]) 22:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)