Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Aluyor: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ToadetteEdit (talk | contribs) !vote |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Keep''' passes NPROF. [[User:Mccapra|Mccapra]] ([[User talk:Mccapra|talk]]) 06:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' passes NPROF. [[User:Mccapra|Mccapra]] ([[User talk:Mccapra|talk]]) 06:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Is in the highest seat of a major university, although not meeting GNG passes NPROF. [[User:ToadetteEdit|<span style="color:#fc65b8;">'''Toadette'''</span>]] <sup>''([[User talk:ToadetteEdit|<span style="color:blue;">Let's discuss together!</span>]])''</sup> 08:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Is in the highest seat of a major university, although not meeting GNG passes NPROF. [[User:ToadetteEdit|<span style="color:#fc65b8;">'''Toadette'''</span>]] <sup>''([[User talk:ToadetteEdit|<span style="color:blue;">Let's discuss together!</span>]])''</sup> 08:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment'''. I would also like to know the reason behind {{u|UtherSRG}}'s decision to bring this topic to AFD again after I informed them [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%20talk:Kaizenify&diff=prev&oldid=1209854910 here] that it met the [[WP:NPROF#C6]] when they moved it to the draft phase initially. Despite my explanation, they still insisted on bringing it to AFD again. Is there any other criteria that UtherSRG is using to make this decision?[[User:Kaizenify|Kaizenify]] ([[User talk:Kaizenify|talk]]) 18:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:10, 26 February 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Emmanuel Aluyor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Nigeria. UtherSRG (talk) 21:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. UtherSRG: Would you like to explain in more detail your argument for why you think he fails NPROF, given that our article lists him as vice chancellor for a university in Nigeria, where vice chancellor is the title used for heads of universities (WP:NPROF#C6)? (As in the UK and elsewhere, the chancellor is a ceremonial title; the vice chancellor is the real head.) While I'm asking, can you also explain why you think his citation record [1] with multiple triple-digit citation counts is not good enough for #C1? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- as the head of a major university satisfies WP:NPROF#C6, as noted by my colleague David Eppstein. Central and Adams (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Engineering. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep passes NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Is in the highest seat of a major university, although not meeting GNG passes NPROF. Toadette (Let's discuss together!) 08:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. I would also like to know the reason behind UtherSRG's decision to bring this topic to AFD again after I informed them here that it met the WP:NPROF#C6 when they moved it to the draft phase initially. Despite my explanation, they still insisted on bringing it to AFD again. Is there any other criteria that UtherSRG is using to make this decision?Kaizenify (talk) 18:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)