Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of solar eclipses visible from the United States: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 20: Line 20:
* '''Keep''' bc Wikipedia is not a directory. This doesn't promise to be an index of every eclipse. It's an incomplete list. The solution is editorial cleanup, not deletion. [[User:Jengod|jengod]] ([[User talk:Jengod|talk]]) 17:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' bc Wikipedia is not a directory. This doesn't promise to be an index of every eclipse. It's an incomplete list. The solution is editorial cleanup, not deletion. [[User:Jengod|jengod]] ([[User talk:Jengod|talk]]) 17:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
*:That is why they have the major edit template. Someone should rewrite the article using that template rather than deleting it and recreating it. [[Special:Contributions/2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC|2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC]] ([[User talk:2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC|talk]]) 08:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
*:That is why they have the major edit template. Someone should rewrite the article using that template rather than deleting it and recreating it. [[Special:Contributions/2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC|2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC]] ([[User talk:2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC|talk]]) 08:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

:The list itself is only meant for total and annular eclipses because if we were to include every single partial eclipse, we’d be listing hundreds of eclipses. But I do think listing them from 1000 to 2251 is a bit excessive. Maybe 1901-2100 might be a bit better and more reasonable. [[Special:Contributions/2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC|2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC]] ([[User talk:2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC|talk]]) 17:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:42, 12 March 2024

List of solar eclipses visible from the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list is incomplete to the point of being misleading. Taking the Charlotte, NC section as an example: it lists only 14 of the 440 solar eclipses visible between the dates selected 1001-2251 (https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/JSEX/JSEX-USA.html). This list can never be made complete, nor should it. To accurately list solar eclipses from the 90 cities on the list would require ~50k bullets. That's excessive.

Suggest deleting this, and starting over with a more focused view, and shorter time period (e.g. 1900-2100). A section on the most notable eclipses such as those with the longest duration, coast-to-coast paths, etc. Rather than have 90 sections for individual cities, have sections for each state and list only eclipses where path passes through that state. MadeYourReadThis (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as city choices seem to be arbitrary, especially with some cities listed being close to each other (relatively speaking at least), and some states left out entirely. The timeframe also seems to be arbitrary, with no real reason for it. Sadustu Tau (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The list itself is only meant for total and annular eclipses because if we were to include every single partial eclipse, we’d be listing hundreds of eclipses. But I do think listing them from 1000 to 2251 is a bit excessive. Maybe 1901-2100 might be a bit better and more reasonable. 2601:5C5:4201:68B0:7CD6:EBEE:595E:F8EC (talk) 17:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]