Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
→Promoting Iranian government POV in Wikipedia?: dismissed as a procedurally invalid submission from a throwaway account: 500 word limit exceeded, no actual prior dispute resolution attempts provided Tag: Replaced |
DTParker1000 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}} |
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=auto</noinclude>}} |
||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
||
== Rio Grande 223 == |
|||
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:DTParker1000|DTParker1000]] ([[User talk:DTParker1000|talk]]) '''at''' 20:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
=== Proposed parties === |
|||
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator --> |
|||
*{{userlinks|DTParker1000}}, ''filing party'' |
|||
*{{userlinks|Xboxtravis7992}} |
|||
;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request |
|||
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. --> |
|||
*[diff of notification Xboxtravis7992] |
|||
;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried |
|||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> |
|||
*Link 1 |
|||
*Link 2 |
|||
=== Statement by DTParker1000 === |
|||
=== Statement by Xboxtravis7992 === |
|||
=== Statement by {Non-party} === |
|||
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information. |
|||
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * --> |
|||
=== Rio Grande 223: Clerk notes === |
|||
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).'' |
|||
* |
|||
=== Rio Grande 223: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> === |
|||
{{anchor|1=Rio Grande 223: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small> |
|||
* |
Revision as of 20:59, 19 March 2024
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Rio Grande 223 | 19 March 2024 | 0/0/0 |
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 7 June 2024 |
Clarification request: mentioning the name of off-wiki threads | none | none | 4 June 2024 |
Amendment request: India-Pakistan | none | (orig. case) | 27 June 2024 |
Clarification request: Contentious topics restrictions | none | none | 10 June 2024 |
Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland | Motion | (orig. case) | 21 June 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
Rio Grande 223
Initiated by DTParker1000 (talk) at 20:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Proposed parties
- DTParker1000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Xboxtravis7992 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- [diff of notification Xboxtravis7992]
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Link 1
- Link 2
Statement by DTParker1000
Statement by Xboxtravis7992
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Rio Grande 223: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Rio Grande 223: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)