User talk:Elyelm: Difference between revisions
→March 2024: Reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| text = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' as a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet]] that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|''illegitimate'']] reasons '''is not''', and that all edits made while evading a block or ban [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]]. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. — [[User:Ingenuity|Ingenuity]] ([[User talk:Ingenuity#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Ingenuity|contribs]]) 19:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}} |
| text = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' as a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet]] that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|''illegitimate'']] reasons '''is not''', and that all edits made while evading a block or ban [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]]. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. — [[User:Ingenuity|Ingenuity]] ([[User talk:Ingenuity#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contribs/Ingenuity|contribs]]) 19:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}} |
||
:{{I was not aware that the user that made the edit is blocked, i apologize if that's against the rules, i don't know anything about this user. |
:{{Thanks for replying @331dot, I was not aware that the user that made the edit is blocked, i apologize if that's against the rules, i don't know anything about this user. |
||
:As for how did i discover that edit and remove it; i '''noticed''' a page i visited previously was missing the Tifinagh script for the name of my region, [[Souss-Massa|Souss Massa]] & [[Souss-Massa-Drâa]]([[Tifinagh]] is the script used for the [[Berber languages|Amazigh language]], which is one of the official languages of the region in question), i scrolled through the '''edit history''' and undid the edit that REMOVED the name in Tifinagh. |
:As for how did i discover that edit and remove it; i '''noticed''' a page i visited previously was missing the Tifinagh script for the name of my region, [[Souss-Massa|Souss Massa]] & [[Souss-Massa-Drâa]]([[Tifinagh]] is the script used for the [[Berber languages|Amazigh language]], which is one of the official languages of the region in question), i scrolled through the '''edit history''' and undid the edit that REMOVED the name in Tifinagh. |
||
:I did some investigation and realized that the same user @[[User:Skitash|Skitash]] has been going around different pages removing any instance of Tifinagh in an attempt to hide and obscure the native identity of the region and only allowing names in Arabic letters (this is a typical behavior for certain racist individuals that like to discriminate against the native Amazigh population) , |
:I did some investigation and realized that the same user @[[User:Skitash|Skitash]] has been going around different pages removing any instance of Tifinagh in an attempt to hide and obscure the native identity of the region and only allowing names in Arabic letters (this is a typical behavior for certain racist individuals that like to discriminate against the native Amazigh population) , |
Latest revision as of 01:18, 23 March 2024
March 2024
[edit]![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC) |
- {{Thanks for replying @331dot, I was not aware that the user that made the edit is blocked, i apologize if that's against the rules, i don't know anything about this user.
- As for how did i discover that edit and remove it; i noticed a page i visited previously was missing the Tifinagh script for the name of my region, Souss Massa & Souss-Massa-Drâa(Tifinagh is the script used for the Amazigh language, which is one of the official languages of the region in question), i scrolled through the edit history and undid the edit that REMOVED the name in Tifinagh.
- I did some investigation and realized that the same user @Skitash has been going around different pages removing any instance of Tifinagh in an attempt to hide and obscure the native identity of the region and only allowing names in Arabic letters (this is a typical behavior for certain racist individuals that like to discriminate against the native Amazigh population) ,
- I hope this answers your question. Elyelm (talk) 01:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC)}}
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Elyelm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe that the severity of the ban and the reasoning behind it (a sockpuppet account)is unwarranted given that this account was created almost 4 years ago, and in this time i only made 3 edits, the most relevant are the last 2 edits (which were Undo edits, for which i was blocked unfairly), there was no malicious intend for those two edits, i was merely re-adding the name of a certain region in my country using an official native language (Berber language)i fail to see how that warrant an indefinite block.
- i understand and respect the Wikipedia community rules and request my ban to be reverted based on those reasons. Elyelm (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You restored an edit that a blocked user had made, but was removed. You'll need to explain how you came to discover that edit and remove it if you aren't that user or in communication with them. 331dot (talk) 07:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.