User talk:Stas678

March 2024

Hello, I'm Jkudlick. I noticed that you recently removed content from Visa policy of Russia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 18:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Please do not imitate or impersonate Lades2222's editing.

Please do not damage WIKIPEDIA due to uncertainties.

If you have already been banned from WIKI, please refrain from further activity. Lades2222 (talk) 01:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello.

You are assumed to be puppets of 'DENOSIO' and 'SUOMI2023' who have violated or damaged WIKIPEDIA. Lades2222 (talk) 08:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Do you see these users all over the place? Stas678 (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Right, There are many villains here who impersonate other people and damage various texts. Lades2222 (talk) 09:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Villain accounts.

I'm restoring the evil deeds of DENOSIO's puppets. You have already damaged many articles on WIKIPEDIA, stalked Ladess2222, and impersonated his editing style. Even though you have been blocked, you continue to create other accounts and commit illegal acts, so you are almost a criminal on WIKIPEDIA. Lades2222 (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

The criminal is you, because you are the one who prevents articles from being edited under good faith. I always justify the reasons for global changes. You need to be treated because you imagine yourself to be God and think that everything is allowed to you. You do not want to consider other opinions and consider everyone to be criminals. The problem is with you.Stas678 (talk) 00:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

No no, you are a criminal.

You caused great damage to Wikipedia during your DENOSIO days, and even after being banned, you created multiple accounts and are still active. From that moment on, it is already a criminal act.

Your edits are unjustified. This is because there is a lot of inaccurate information.

And it imitates and impersonates Lades2222's editing style. Lades2222 (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

I consider the blocking to be unfounded, because it was because of your position that I was blocked. I'm not a villain. I always justify my reasons for editing. I sometimes use your style because, in my opinion, it is correct. But I have my own style, which really annoys you. But for some reason he doesn’t irritate anyone except you. Look for problems in yourself, not in me. Stas678 (talk) 00:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

It is wrong to imitate and 'impersonate' Lades2222's editing style. I am annoyed by your behavior.

Additionally, the activities of blocked villains are illegal activities in and of themselves.

So your existence is already the cause of the problem. You need treatment. Lades2222 (talk) 00:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, villain.

You've been impersonating me for a long time, mimicking my editing style. It's a violation.

And even if there are legitimate parts of the edit, the fact that it has already been blocked multiple times is itself unjustified.

I'll defend your misconduct until it goes away. Lades2222 (talk) 15:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello , terrorist . You are the main villain of Wikipedia because you sit and follow me all day long. You better sleep, otherwise I see that you have gone crazy. I don't understand how you haven't been noticed yet. I don't want to have anything in common with you, just leave me alone. You won't achieve anything anyway. You promised that you would leave the community. So, I hope that this will happen very soon. It will be much easier for everyone without you. Best wishes . Stas678 (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

First of all, your editing style consists of a lot of inaccurate information and radical developments.

It's a hindrance to other people's editing.

So You are a terrorist threatening Wikipedia.

You have been blocked many times, and you have said many times that you will leave, but those promises have not been kept.

Wikipedia will be at peace only when you disappear.

I will 'defend' these areas until you are gone.

Before you showed up, there were no problems with Wikipedia's visa-related articles. Lades2222 (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Firstly, I am not a terrorist, but a person who wants to improve Wikipedia. Secondly, I am updating the information because there is a lot of outdated information in the visa articles. And in all this time you still haven’t put the articles in order. I see that this annoys you because I am the one taking your job away. That's why it infuriates you, I understand. And I was blocked because of you, because the administrators did not approach this situation seriously and did not understand the essence of the problem. Stas678 (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Again, your edits are not 'improvements' but 'chaos'.

Suddenly deleting old information is also problematic.

But What's worse is that there are many cases where unverified and uncertain information is recorded.

Not only I but other editors have already reversed your radical edits.

Having your accounts blocked shows that there is a problem with your behavior. Don't you realize it? Or is he intentionally going further?

So, I'm pointing out that your existence is wrong. Lades2222 (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

What about the principle of freedom on Wikipedia? I always give reasons for my radical changes. Stas678 (talk) 16:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Freedom without restraint is ‘indulgence’ and anything that goes beyond it becomes ‘harm.’

And.. You said that I didn't organize any of the posts, because I don't necessarily need to organize them. It's simple.

But your biggest problem is that you keep posting uncertain information. Lades2222 (talk) 16:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Let me at least edit Russia's visa policy. I didn't do anything criminal. I justified the reasons for radical changes. And even after my minor edits you still correct it. Let's agree: I'm not stopping you from editing, and you're not stopping me from editing. Will it do? Stas678 (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)