Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Shimer: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→David Shimer: Keep Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
placing vote to delete Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''Comment''': And a long, rambling NPR discussion/review/analysis thing [https://www.npr.org/2020/06/09/871927512/in-rigged-a-comprehensive-account-of-decades-of-election-interference]. Not to be negative, but they always have lots to say about stuff... [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 22:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC) |
* '''Comment''': And a long, rambling NPR discussion/review/analysis thing [https://www.npr.org/2020/06/09/871927512/in-rigged-a-comprehensive-account-of-decades-of-election-interference]. Not to be negative, but they always have lots to say about stuff... [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 22:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' as the book reviews included above show that he passes notability standards for authors. [[User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives|DaniloDaysOfOurLives]] ([[User talk:DaniloDaysOfOurLives|talk]]) 04:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' as the book reviews included above show that he passes notability standards for authors. [[User:DaniloDaysOfOurLives|DaniloDaysOfOurLives]] ([[User talk:DaniloDaysOfOurLives|talk]]) 04:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' This is not an important book and therefore he does not pass notability standards. Honestly, the page feels self-written and like an advertisement for himself. [[Special:Contributions/81.134.244.122|81.134.244.122]] ([[User talk:81.134.244.122|talk]]) 22:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:58, 29 March 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David Shimer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I apologize if this is not a good nomination I don't normally deal with biographies. He doesn't seem that notable based on Wikipedia:Notability_(people) criteria , having only published one book and that book does not seem to be that impactful to me. EvilxFish (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, History, England, Connecticut, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Probably passes AUTHOR with book reviews in the Guardian, Washington Post and NY Times [1], [2] and [3] Oaktree b (talk) 22:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: And a long, rambling NPR discussion/review/analysis thing [4]. Not to be negative, but they always have lots to say about stuff... Oaktree b (talk) 22:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as the book reviews included above show that he passes notability standards for authors. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is not an important book and therefore he does not pass notability standards. Honestly, the page feels self-written and like an advertisement for himself. 81.134.244.122 (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)