Talk:Infinity Laplacian: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 23:38, 2 April 2024

definition

In the definition: Should $\Delta _{\infty }u(x)$ read $\langle \Delta _{\infty }u,u\rangle$ or something? Having x-dependence on the left but not the right seems strange. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.234.240.61 (talk) 12:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion would not help: in the article,

\langle \dots \rangle

stands for Euclidean inner product (the gradients to which it is applied on the right are vectors), not for

\int f(x)g(x)dx

. Anyway, the right side also depends on x, one could write

u(x)

everywhere, but it would make reading a bit harder. Maybe it should indeed be changed. GaborPete (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed this issue now, I hope. GaborPete (talk) 23:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:25, 9 March 2024 edit Cewbot (talk \| contribs) Bots 6,567,987 edits m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field. Tag: Talk banner shell conversion ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 23:38, 2 April 2024 edit undo GaborPete (talk \| contribs) 276 edits →‎definition
Line 7:		Line 7:

	: Your suggestion would not help: in the article, <math>\langle \dots \rangle</math> stands for Euclidean inner product (the gradients to which it is applied on the right are vectors), not for <math>\int f(x)g(x) dx </math>. Anyway, the right side also depends on x, one could write <math>u(x)</math> everywhere, but it would make reading a bit harder. Maybe it should indeed be changed. [[User:GaborPete\|GaborPete]] ([[User talk:GaborPete\|talk]]) 21:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)		: Your suggestion would not help: in the article, <math>\langle \dots \rangle</math> stands for Euclidean inner product (the gradients to which it is applied on the right are vectors), not for <math>\int f(x)g(x) dx </math>. Anyway, the right side also depends on x, one could write <math>u(x)</math> everywhere, but it would make reading a bit harder. Maybe it should indeed be changed. [[User:GaborPete\|GaborPete]] ([[User talk:GaborPete\|talk]]) 21:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

			:: I have fixed this issue now, I hope. [[User:GaborPete\|GaborPete]] ([[User talk:GaborPete\|talk]]) 23:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)