User:Pacamah/sandbox: Difference between revisions
aaaasfa Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
more writing Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
||
| Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
=== Unionization Efforts === |
=== Unionization Efforts === |
||
{{Further|Graduate student employee unionization}}[[Boston University]] graduate workers had began organizing efforts in late 2020 as a result of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] in an effort to implement a safer workplace. Graduate workers would then vote to affiliate with [[Service Employees International Union]] Local 509 in mid-2021, which also represents adjunct professors, lecturers, and residential advisors. They would then begin successful a public campaign of union [[Card check|authorization forms]] beginning September 2022, and voting 1,414 to 28 in December 2022 in favor of unionization. |
|||
{{Further|Graduate student employee unionization}} |
|||
The [[1979 Boston University strike]] was between |
|||
=== Contract negotiations === |
=== Contract negotiations === |
||
Revision as of 23:55, 9 April 2024
Kalima v. State of Hawai'i
| Baehr v. Miike | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Full case name | Leona Kalima, Diane Boner, Raynette Nalani Ah Chong, Special Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Ching, Deceased, Caroline Bright, Donna Kuehu, and James Akiona, et al., vs. State of Hawai‘i, State of Hawai‘i Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, et al. |
| Decided | February 7, 2024 |
| Court membership | |
| Chief judge | Mark E. Recktenwald |
| Associate judges | Sabrina McKenna, Todd W. Eddins, Lisa M. Ginoza, Vladimir Devens |
| Case opinions | |
| "The spirit of Aloha clashes with a federally-mandated lifestyle that lets citizens walk around with deadly weapons during day-to-day activities" | |
Kalima, et al. v. State, et al.,
Civil No. 99-4771-12 LWC (First Cir. Haw.) (2023) was a decision of the Supreme Court of Hawaii which held that Native Hawaiians should be awarded damages due to Hawaiian home lands.
Background
Litigation History
Issues before the Court
Rivera v. State of Hawaii
https://ag.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Kalima-writ-denied-and-appeal-dismissed.pdf
Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
| Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued January 9, 2023 Decided May 18, 2023 | |
| Full case name | Ohio Adjutant General's Department et al. v. Federal Labor Relations Authority et al. |
| Docket no. | 21-1454 |
| Citations | 598 U.S. __ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Judgment for defendants, [1] (Washington Supreme Court, Dec. 16, 2021); |
| Holding | |
| The National Labor Relations Act did not preempt Glacier’s state tort claims related to the destruction of company property during a labor dispute where the union failed to take reasonable precautions to avoid foreseeable and imminent danger to the property. Washington Supreme Court reversed and remanded. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson |
| Dissent | Alito, Gorsuch |
Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, No. 21-1454, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that , concerning . In an - decision, the Court .
Wilkins v. US
| Bittner v. United States | |
|---|---|
| |
| Argued November 2, 2022 Decided February 28, 2023 | |
| Full case name | Alexandru Bittner v. United States |
| Docket no. | 21-1195 |
| Citations | 598 U.S. __ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Judgment for defendants, [2] (Washington Supreme Court, Dec. 16, 2021); |
| Holding | |
| The National Labor Relations Act did not preempt Glacier’s state tort claims related to the destruction of company property during a labor dispute where the union failed to take reasonable precautions to avoid foreseeable and imminent danger to the property. Washington Supreme Court reversed and remanded. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Barrett, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh |
| Concurrence | Thomas (in judgment), joined by Gorsuch |
| Concurrence | Alito (in judgment), joined by Thomas, Gorsuch |
| Dissent | Jackson |
| Laws applied | |
| National Labor Relations Act | |
Liza Minelli Outlives
Club Penguin Times
Cats in classical musico r smthn
2024 Boston University strike
| 2024 Boston University strike | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | March 25, 2024 - present (2 months, 4 weeks and 1 day) | ||
| Location | |||
| Goals |
| ||
| Methods | |||
| Status | In progress | ||
| Parties | |||
| |||
The 2024 Boston University strike is an ongoing labor strike in Boston, Massachusetts by graduate student workers at Boston University. The strike began on March 25, 2024, and was organized by the Boston University Graduate Workers United labor union in affiliation with Service Employees International Union Local 509.
Background
Unionization Efforts
Boston University graduate workers had began organizing efforts in late 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in an effort to implement a safer workplace. Graduate workers would then vote to affiliate with Service Employees International Union Local 509 in mid-2021, which also represents adjunct professors, lecturers, and residential advisors. They would then begin successful a public campaign of union authorization forms beginning September 2022, and voting 1,414 to 28 in December 2022 in favor of unionization.
The 1979 Boston University strike was between