Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roboquest: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Keep |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Unfortunately fails [[WP:GNG]]. Lack of notability indicated by no [[WP:VG/S]] review sources, either in the article or doing a [[WP:BEFORE]], which only yielded mention in one [[WP:OFFLINE]] source from the Dutch magazine ''Gameplay''. Reviews for two situational sources: ''TechRaptor'' and ''Gaming Age'', although source discussions for neither seem particularly positive and both authors, whilst having a few reviews under their belt, have no experience or presence outside writing for their respective websites. Absent more reliable sources being found, seems like coverage is mostly confined to primary sources, non-reliable indie blogs and game guide type articles. Mindful this is a little closer to borderline than usual so welcome thoughts. [[User:Vrxces|ＶＲＸＣＥＳ]] ([[User talk:Vrxces|talk]]) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |
Unfortunately fails [[WP:GNG]]. Lack of notability indicated by no [[WP:VG/S]] review sources, either in the article or doing a [[WP:BEFORE]], which only yielded mention in one [[WP:OFFLINE]] source from the Dutch magazine ''Gameplay''. Reviews for two situational sources: ''TechRaptor'' and ''Gaming Age'', although source discussions for neither seem particularly positive and both authors, whilst having a few reviews under their belt, have no experience or presence outside writing for their respective websites. Absent more reliable sources being found, seems like coverage is mostly confined to primary sources, non-reliable indie blogs and game guide type articles. Mindful this is a little closer to borderline than usual so welcome thoughts. [[User:Vrxces|ＶＲＸＣＥＳ]] ([[User talk:Vrxces|talk]]) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games|list of Video games-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Vrxces|ＶＲＸＣＥＳ]] ([[User talk:Vrxces|talk]]) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Video games|list of Video games-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Vrxces|ＶＲＸＣＥＳ]] ([[User talk:Vrxces|talk]]) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep:''' Honestly, expected to !vote the other way before digging in here. I did find an in-depth preview article at Jeux Video ([https://www.jeuxvideo.com/news/1845298/ce-jeu-d-action-hyper-dynamique-est-a-95-d-avis-positifs-sur-steam-je-l-ai-essaye-pour-vous-et-ca-vaut-vraiment-le-coup.htm]), a reliable French video game website which is listed on [[WP:VG/RS]], along with a completely random but seemingly [[WP:RS]] review from the ''[[Arkansas Democrat-Gazette]]'' ([https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2024/jan/28/game-on-roboquest-delivers-the-wow-with-graphics/]). These articles combined with the TechRaptor and Gaming Age hits put it over the edge into keep category for me. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color: #8B4513">Nomader</span>]] ([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color: #8B4513">talk</span>]]) 18:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:31, 12 April 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Roboquest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unfortunately fails WP:GNG. Lack of notability indicated by no WP:VG/S review sources, either in the article or doing a WP:BEFORE, which only yielded mention in one WP:OFFLINE source from the Dutch magazine Gameplay. Reviews for two situational sources: TechRaptor and Gaming Age, although source discussions for neither seem particularly positive and both authors, whilst having a few reviews under their belt, have no experience or presence outside writing for their respective websites. Absent more reliable sources being found, seems like coverage is mostly confined to primary sources, non-reliable indie blogs and game guide type articles. Mindful this is a little closer to borderline than usual so welcome thoughts. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Honestly, expected to !vote the other way before digging in here. I did find an in-depth preview article at Jeux Video ([1]), a reliable French video game website which is listed on WP:VG/RS, along with a completely random but seemingly WP:RS review from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette ([2]). These articles combined with the TechRaptor and Gaming Age hits put it over the edge into keep category for me. Nomader (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)