Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Air Lines Flight 520: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:16, 3 May 2024

Delta Air Lines Flight 520

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The definition of WP:NOTNEWS. Losing an inflatable slide mid-flight isn't something that's gonna get sustained coverage, and I know (not "I don't think", I know) it's gonna fail the ten-year test. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 04:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why not request speed delete if you mr. einstein think you know (not "i don't think", i know) that this will 100% fail that nonsense test? like those random plane crashes that articles from the 90's that would definitely fail that 10 year test?? GeekyAviation (talk) 05:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:LASTING. The aircraft involved is 33 years old, this isn’t a brand new aircraft that was recently delivered. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 05:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and New York.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 :{{la|1=Delta Air Lines Flight 520}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Air Lines Flight 520|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 3#{{anchorencode:Delta Air Lines Flight 520}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1221983275/cur|edits since nomination]])
 :({{Find sources AFD|title=Delta Air Lines Flight 520}})
-The definition of [[WP:NOTNEWS]]. Losing an inflatable slide mid-flight isn't something that's gonna get [[WP:SUSTAINED|sustained coverage]], and I know (not "I don't think", I ''know'') it's gonna fail the [[WP:10Y|ten-year test]]. '''''[[User:LilianaUwU|<span  '''''[[User:LilianaUwU|<span style="font-family:default;color:#246BCE;">Liliana</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#FF1493;">UwU</span>]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:LilianaUwU|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/LilianaUwU|contributions]])</sup> 04:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)</small>
+The definition of [[WP:NOTNEWS]]. Losing an inflatable slide mid-flight isn't something that's gonna get [[WP:SUSTAINED|sustained coverage]], and I know (not "I don't think", I ''know'') it's gonna fail the [[WP:10Y|ten-year test]].   '''''[[User:LilianaUwU|<span style="font-family:default;color:#246BCE;">Liliana</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#FF1493;">UwU</span>]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:LilianaUwU|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/LilianaUwU|contributions]])</sup> 04:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)</small>
 :why not request speed delete if you mr. einstein think you know (not "i don't think", i know) that this will 100% fail that nonsense test? like those random plane crashes that articles from the 90's that would definitely fail that 10 year test?? [[User:GeekyAviation|GeekyAviation]] ([[User talk:GeekyAviation|talk]]) 05:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
-:*'''Delete''' Per [[WP:NOTNEWS]] and [[WP:LASTING]]. The aircraft involved is 33 years old, this isn’t a brand new aircraft that was recently delivered. [[User:Aviationwikiflight|Aviationwikiflight]] ([[User talk:Aviationwikiflight|talk]]) 05:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
+'''Delete''' Per [[WP:NOTNEWS]] and [[WP:LASTING]]. The aircraft involved is 33 years old, this isn’t a brand new aircraft that was recently delivered. [[User:Aviationwikiflight|Aviationwikiflight]] ([[User talk:Aviationwikiflight|talk]]) 05:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Aviation|Aviation]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/New York|New York]].