Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WISEA J120037.79-784508.3: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
→‎WISEA J120037.79-784508.3: added sentence on paragraph 3 of WP:NASTCRIT.
Line 11: Line 11:


:*'''Keep''', searching for the name W1200-7845 i found a lot of sources about this object: [https://www.sci.news/astronomy/young-brown-dwarf-circumstellar-disk-08496.html] [https://www.nasa.gov/universe/disk-detective-needs-your-help-finding-disks-where-planets-form/] [https://www.ou.edu/cas/news/news/ou-graduate-student-maria-schutte-presents-findings-on-young--ne] [https://news.mit.edu/2020/closest-young-brown-dwarf-0602] [https://www.astronomy.com/science/how-do-planets-form-nasa-wants-your-help-finding-out/] [https://english.tachyonbeam.com/2020/06/07/w1200-7845-is-the-youngest-brown-dwarf-discovered-in-the-cosmic-neighborhood-with-a-protoplanetary-disk/] [https://www.techexplorist.com/closest-young-brown-dwarf-disk-spotted/32780/?amp=1], and there are many more. Celestial bodies that received attention by media are generally considered notable. According to WP:NASTRO, {{tq|Astronomical objects are notable if they have received substantial attention and coverage in [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]], usually the scientific literature and/or popular media}}. [[User:InTheAstronomy32|InTheAstronomy32]] ([[User talk:InTheAstronomy32|talk]]) 20:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
:*'''Keep''', searching for the name W1200-7845 i found a lot of sources about this object: [https://www.sci.news/astronomy/young-brown-dwarf-circumstellar-disk-08496.html] [https://www.nasa.gov/universe/disk-detective-needs-your-help-finding-disks-where-planets-form/] [https://www.ou.edu/cas/news/news/ou-graduate-student-maria-schutte-presents-findings-on-young--ne] [https://news.mit.edu/2020/closest-young-brown-dwarf-0602] [https://www.astronomy.com/science/how-do-planets-form-nasa-wants-your-help-finding-out/] [https://english.tachyonbeam.com/2020/06/07/w1200-7845-is-the-youngest-brown-dwarf-discovered-in-the-cosmic-neighborhood-with-a-protoplanetary-disk/] [https://www.techexplorist.com/closest-young-brown-dwarf-disk-spotted/32780/?amp=1], and there are many more. Celestial bodies that received attention by media are generally considered notable. According to WP:NASTRO, {{tq|Astronomical objects are notable if they have received substantial attention and coverage in [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]], usually the scientific literature and/or popular media}}. [[User:InTheAstronomy32|InTheAstronomy32]] ([[User talk:InTheAstronomy32|talk]]) 20:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

::: I think articles published on, for example, the websites [[NASA]] or [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology| MIT]] pass paragraph 3 of 'Criteria' as they are non-trivial sources [[WP:NASTCRIT]]. [[User:Richard Nowell|Richard Nowell]] ([[User talk:Richard Nowell|talk]]) 16:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:51, 4 May 2024

WISEA J120037.79-784508.3

WISEA J120037.79-784508.3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This object does not seem to meet the notability guideline for astronomical objects. I cannot find any sources with significant coverage besides the discovery paper or press releases directly based on that paper. Complex/Rational 14:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, searching for the name W1200-7845 i found a lot of sources about this object: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], and there are many more. Celestial bodies that received attention by media are generally considered notable. According to WP:NASTRO, Astronomical objects are notable if they have received substantial attention and coverage in reliable sources, usually the scientific literature and/or popular media. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 20:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think articles published on, for example, the websites NASA or MIT pass paragraph 3 of 'Criteria' as they are non-trivial sources WP:NASTCRIT. Richard Nowell (talk) 16:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]