Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youlin Magazine

Youlin Magazine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Youlin Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's nothing sig/in-depth as required by WP:GNG. It's more of a promotional article relying on press releases styled coverage. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 22:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 22:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, News media, and Entertainment. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
• COMMENT I am asking the deletion nominator Saqib to give some credibility to the editorial staffs at Dawn newspaper, The Express Tribune newspaper that they found this magazine worthy of their news coverage. There are 3 existing references by them at this article. More coverage and more sources can be found I am sure, if we try. For people that are not familiar with Youlin Magazine, it's a 'Pakistani and Chinese cultural monthly online magazine'. As Wikipedia editors, many people like me have been using it for several years now and find it very useful...Ngrewal1 (talk) 22:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

  Your statement gives off a vibe of WP:ILIKEIT. Merely having coverage in WP:RS doesn't automatically mean this online magazine is WP:N. We need sig/in-depth coverage that also meets WP:SIRS. The current sourcing can back up claims for WP:V, but it's not sufficient to establish WP:N. If you reckon there's solid coverage like that, you gotta lay it down right here. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 22:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

There is no need to argue WP:ILIKEIT and you don't. I feel there is no need for anybody to 'lay it down here' at the AfD Forum, some of it is already there at the article for everybody to see. Yes, the article can use some improvement, I admit. Besides myself, I'll let the Wikipedia community decide whether this article is worth saving or not?...Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

I thoroughly checked the references already in the article and since they were not good enough to meet WP:GNG, I put this up for deletion. So now, you or anyone else has gotta come up with coverage that passes WP:SIRS right here which can help establish WP:N. Don't just say there are sources out there somewhere, show us by giving them. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 09:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

• Keep as pointed out above by User:Ngrewal1, User:Saqib has been doubtful regarding WP:Notability when it comes to Dawn (Newspaper), The Express tribune and The Nation (newspaper) as he has declined my Draft:Gumn despite it clearly meets WP:GNG. Weird, how no one is questioning his actions?182.182.97.3 (talk) 11:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

  I think someone warned you before to avoid WP:PA. Why don't you stick to the topic and chat about the issue, not about each other, yeah? —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

  But I'll voice my thoughts, that's my opinion. I guess Wikipedia supports WP:COI. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 12:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)