User talk:Jacque6306: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:25, 18 May 2024

This is Jacque6306's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Howard Cox (British politician) (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

SkyNews only provides in-depth covarage, but to pass General notability guidlines it requires multiple in-depth covarage from independent reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Howard Cox (British politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 10:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jacque6306! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 10:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Grabup, thanks for your review, your conclusion was not completely unexpected, I also had a hard time judging notability. I have made some further edits to the article, including the addition of in-depth coverage from other new sources. I have made references to in-depth coverage from the following news sources: Sky News (commercial, national), BBC News (state-owned, national), Kent Online (commercial, regional). Please let me know if this meets your expectations or not. Thanks! Jacque6306 (talk) 22:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 22:20, 18 May 2024 edit Jacque6306 (talk \| contribs) 50 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:25, 18 May 2024 edit undo Jacque6306 (talk \| contribs) 50 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:
	[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]		[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

	:Hello @[[User:Grabup\|Grabup]], thanks for your review, your conclusion was not completely unexpected, I also had a hard time judging notability. I have made some further edits to the article, including the addition of in-depth coverage from other new sources. I have made references to in-depth coverage in the following news sources: Sky News (commercial, national), BBC News (state-owned, national), Kent Online (commercial, regional). Please let me know if this meets your expectations or not. Thanks! [[User:Jacque6306\|Jacque6306]] ([[User talk:Jacque6306#top\|talk]]) 22:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)		:Hello @[[User:Grabup\|Grabup]], thanks for your review, your conclusion was not completely unexpected, I also had a hard time judging notability. I have made some further edits to the article, including the addition of in-depth coverage from other new sources. I have made references to in-depth coverage from the following news sources: Sky News (commercial, national), BBC News (state-owned, national), Kent Online (commercial, regional). Please let me know if this meets your expectations or not. Thanks! [[User:Jacque6306\|Jacque6306]] ([[User talk:Jacque6306#top\|talk]]) 22:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)