User talk:Myleadingcampus: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:08, 19 May 2024

This is Myleadingcampus's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Myleadingcampus/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Myleadingcampus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Myleadingcampus/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to follow up on our discussion at IRC. Adding material without citing sources is just making the draft worse, not better. Learn how to qualify your sources - brief mentions and quotes from Datta in news media are not helpful in establishing notability. And for a biographical article, inline citations are mandatory. You cannot get a draft accepted by going in this direction. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:28, 18 May 2024 edit DoubleGrazing (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 103,892 edits Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:08, 19 May 2024 edit undo Jmcgnh (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers 15,804 edits →‎Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 18): followup Next edit →
Line 36:		Line 36:

	[[User:DoubleGrazing\|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing\|talk]]) 06:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->		[[User:DoubleGrazing\|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing\|talk]]) 06:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->
			: Just a note to follow up on our discussion at IRC. Adding material without citing sources is just making the draft worse, not better. Learn how to qualify your sources - brief mentions and quotes from Datta in news media are not helpful in establishing notability. And for a biographical article, inline citations are mandatory. You cannot get a draft accepted by going in this direction. '''[[user:jmcgnh\|<span style="color:#2eb85c">— jmcgnh</span>]]<sup><small>[[user talk:jmcgnh\|<span style="color:#1e5213">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/jmcgnh\|<span style="color:#73b516">(contribs)</span>]]</small></sup>''' 17:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)