Talk:Paras Shah

Biased

I find this very biased. The lines about revolution. PLEASE STOP STATING YOUR OPINION ON WIKIPEDIA. MAKE IT UNBIASED!

---

The article on Crown Prince Paras of Nepal doesn't sound entirely unbiased. I have checked it as per the opinion of the last person. The incidences mentioned and the the reports on the Sources mentioned do not correspond. Please make Wikipedia unbiased. We do not need people who like/ do not like Royalty of Nepal to be writing here their personal opinions.

Specially the sections where it says the the Palace tried to reach an out of court deal does not have any sources mentioned and as long as sources are not mentioned kindly refrain yourself from posting.

Wikipedia is not the personal playground of a few people who want to put baseless allegations. Many users assaulting this page have already received warnings for abusing wikipedia hence please refrain.

One Unaccounted for Homicide

Someone has included one uncited allegation of homicide (citations have been provided for the well known case of Praveen Gurung). If anyone has any information regarding this event/non-event, please include a citation in the text or discuss it here. --(Mingus ah um 02:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC))

This uncited allegation of homicide has been removed, but it appears that one documented allegation of assault was removed as well. When I have the time, I'll sift through the edit history and restore the missing information. --(Mingus ah um 21:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC))

For future reference, this is the text for the now absent allegation of homocide. There was never a citation for this incident, so, unless someone can provide something to back up this story, I agree that it should not be included within the text of the article: (Case of taxi driver homicide: In another incident, Paras was accused of killing a taxidriver with his vehicle during a drug-fuelled excursion) --(Mingus ah um 21:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC))

Incidents v. Allegations

I'm fairly certain that it's standard wiki policy to refer to allegations instead of incidents when we discuss criminal action/s which have not been prosecuted. If anyone has any qualms about this, talk about it here. --(Mingus ah um 01:53, 28 April 2006 (UTC))

Accusations

A lot of the events and stories told in this page has been made by the supporters of some political parties of Nepal who are against the Royal family of Nepal. As they (political parties) have been accused of spreading viloence and allying with terrorists (Maoists) of Nepal, the Royal family has been found taking actions to stop them from allying against the Nation's wishes.

Allegations and accusations should not be a part of Wikipedia and Wikipedia should be free of personal biases towards any events or persons. As long as facts and incidents are not factually correct kindly refrain from posting.

Kindly refrain yourself from posting contradictory, controversial and conspiracy theory statements. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia believes in giving facts, facts, & facts and anything other than facts need to be omitted strictly.

Mr. or Ms. IP address: While I appreciate your concern (after all, wiki can only succeed if it incorporates a wide variety of perspectives into its articles), I would appreciate it if you refrained from unilaterally removing sourced information. If you have a problem with what I have reinstated, discuss it here, preferably with citations. My explanations for my reverts can be found on your IP address talk page (User talk:86.193.27.168). --(Mingus ah um 21:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC))

---

I (Jack of all,...) have edited the Prince Paras of Nepal page extensively and worked as far as possible to provide the picture within the diameter of 'Acceptability'. As we all know there is a lot of defamation going on in Nepal and everyone is trying to put down someone or the other. Similar seemed to be the case in the Wiki Page of Prince Paras.

Please do not write more than you can provide from your sources...specially when you are alleging someone for Killing please provide accurate sources. The lines such as 'proofs were bought' do not sound good until and unless very professional and credible sources are provided.

If you have any problems within what I have done, please discuss before reporting biased facts.

Also, please provide the source for the line, "Since royal authority has been curtailed and the king stripped of most of his powers, there is a growing sentiment that the police should reopen the case against Crown Prince Paras." Please provide the source for "growing sentiment". Or else accept the fact that is as reported in the media. Do not provide more biased facts.

---

Re: The Removal of Sourced Information

Well... It appears that we have a second Monarchist (or the same one on a new IP address) on our hands who is interested in removing sourced information. I don't have the patience to deal with it. If anyone else want's to fight this edit war, his edits begin here: 12:06, 2 June 2006 (hist) (diff) Paras of Nepal (→Allegation of homicide) --(Mingus ah um 19:08, 2 June 2006 (UTC))

Just checked my watchlist, and reverted some left-wing vandalism for a change. Regardless, this page continues to be deconstructed by right-wing trolls; I only needed to glance to see that at least one source has been removed (again!) since my last edit.

Good luck to those who care about honestly defining this region, and those who would simply like to (collectively) work toward a decent article. I don't have the time to wage an edit war over a nation which does not fall within my primary focus. Peace. --(Mingus ah um 20:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC))

The article on Crown Prince Paras of Nepal doesn't sound entirely unbiased. I have checked it as per the opinion of the earlier persons. The incidences mentioned and the the reports on the Sources mentioned do not correspond. Please make Wikipedia unbiased. We do not need people who like/ do not like Royalty of Nepal to be writing here their personal opinions.

Specially the sections where it says the the Palace tried to reach an out of court deal does not have any sources mentioned and as long as sources are not mentioned kindly refrain yourself from posting.

He is NOT the CROWN PRINCE HEIR APPARENT!

The position of crown prince was taken away from him during 2006 by the reinstated (1999) parliament of Nepal!

Why is this not written here? Do monarchists who cannot change facts on the ground they dont like, try to make a make-believe Nepal here on Wikipedia instead?

Togrimm user of the norwegian Wikipedia, 2007-04-13