Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JWM: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Updating nomination page with notices and new AFDC cat (assisted) |
→JWM: Reply |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Fails [[WP: N]]. I found some mentions in some Linux-related books, but nothing that covers the software in-depth. The review in Linux Magazine is broken, but as it stands I can't find evidence that this meets notability standards, since multiple sources are required to establish notability. [[User:HyperAccelerated|HyperAccelerated]] ([[User talk:HyperAccelerated|talk]]) 17:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
Fails [[WP: N]]. I found some mentions in some Linux-related books, but nothing that covers the software in-depth. The review in Linux Magazine is broken, but as it stands I can't find evidence that this meets notability standards, since multiple sources are required to establish notability. [[User:HyperAccelerated|HyperAccelerated]] ([[User talk:HyperAccelerated|talk]]) 17:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 18:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 18:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)</small> |
||
:'''Delete '''per notability issues. [[Special:Contributions/104.7.152.180|104.7.152.180]] ([[User talk:104.7.152.180|talk]]) 13:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:53, 29 May 2024
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JWM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP: N. I found some mentions in some Linux-related books, but nothing that covers the software in-depth. The review in Linux Magazine is broken, but as it stands I can't find evidence that this meets notability standards, since multiple sources are required to establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 17:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Owen× ☎ 18:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per notability issues. 104.7.152.180 (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)