Donaghy's Rope & Twine Co Ltd v Wright Stephenson & Co: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Italicized Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
m de-orphaned |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} |
||
{{Orphan|date=October 2014}} |
|||
{{one source|date=October 2014}} |
{{one source|date=October 2014}} |
||
| Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
[[Category:1906 in New Zealand law]] |
[[Category:1906 in New Zealand law]] |
||
[[Category:1906 in case law]] |
[[Category:1906 in case law]] |
||
{{NewZealand-case-law-stub}} |
{{NewZealand-case-law-stub}} |
||
Latest revision as of 02:09, 2 June 2024
 | This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (October 2014) |
| Donaghy's Rope & Twine Co Ltd v Wright Stephenson & Co | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | Donaghy's Rope & Twine Co Ltd v Wright Stephenson & Co |
| Citation | (1906) 2 NZLR 641 |
| Court membership | |
| Judge sitting | Coopper J |
Donaghy's Rope & Twine Co Ltd v Wright Stephenson & Co (1906) 2 NZLR 641 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the risk of goods under the Sale of Goods Act 1908.[1]
References[edit]
- ^ Gerbic, Philippa; Lawrence, Martin (2003). Understanding Commercial Law (5th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71714-9.
 | This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |