User talk:TopCamel

Hello TopCamel, welcome to Wikipedia. I deleted the accidentally created User:Topcamel page for you. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;

• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Angela 22:51, Nov 8, 2003 (UTC)

How new do you mean? If they're very new, perhaps Google just hasn't found them yet. It will do eventually. It will probably find them quicker if they are linked to from more places. Are you trying to search Google using "site:www.wikipedia.org". If so, that might be the problem, as the servers are now split and called "en" and "en2". So, if you try to search Google for articles on www.Wikipedia.org, it won't find them. Try just "wikipedia.org" and it will find both en and en2. For example, it finds Alternative metal which is currently on the en2 server, even thought that was only created a few days ago. Angela 19:48, 11 Nov 2003 (UTC)

The current version of alternative metal isn't listed as a copyvio, but there was an older, now deleted, version which was. It was created on 18 December 2002 and listed for deletion by Hephaestos on 9 October 2003 and deleted by Delirium on 16 October as far as I can tell, although it's possible it was deleted and recreated with the same content in between these dates. The reason for the deletion was that the original article was an exact copy of the this web page. The current version is clearly not, although I have to say it has a lot of similarities. Perhaps you could edit further to remove any perceived similarities and avoid future deletions. Does that answer you question? Let me know if not. Angela

Hi, just to clarify, I'm not saying it is a copyvio. I'm saying the old version probably was, but that was not created by you, and was deleted a month ago. A summary of a web page is probably not a copyvio, but different people may see it as one if the two are too similar. If you want to seek the views of more people on this, then the village pump is a good place to ask, or the talk page of somewhere like Wikipedia:Copyrights or Wikipedia:Possible copyright infringements. Angela

Hello. I'm 17 also. Welcome to Wikipedia. Alexandros 00:15, 13 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians in Spain

Hello TopCamel this message is a invitation to categorize your userpage in the category: Category:Wikipedians in Spain or in the adecuate sub-category and erasing your name from the equivalent list since the lists of users are in process of being transformed into categories. Remember: You can categorize your user page in more than one category. example: your actual location and your origin country.

for more info see: Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location

Saludos. --Mnts 07:17, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Troy Stetina

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Troy Stetina, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

Troy Stetina – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. LagrangeCalvert_{<Talk / Contribs>} 08:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Alternative metal

I have nominated Alternative metal, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative metal (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 17:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Troy Stetina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troy Stetina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troy Stetina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 21:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Troy Stetina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troy Stetina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troy Stetina (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)