Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 13: Line 13:
:*{{ping|PARAKANYAA}} How does it pass [[WP:NBOOK]]? Ignore the misleading claim above that there is coverage from "Kansas City Star" because it simply not verifiable. [[User:ArvindPalaskar|ArvindPalaskar]] ([[User talk:ArvindPalaskar|talk]]) 09:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
:*{{ping|PARAKANYAA}} How does it pass [[WP:NBOOK]]? Ignore the misleading claim above that there is coverage from "Kansas City Star" because it simply not verifiable. [[User:ArvindPalaskar|ArvindPalaskar]] ([[User talk:ArvindPalaskar|talk]]) 09:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' At best we have only 1 review that meets [[WP:V]]. I agree that special care should be taken over a fringe subject but even without that this book easily fails all points of [[WP:NBOOK]]. [[User:Azuredivay|Azuredivay]] ([[User talk:Azuredivay|talk]]) 11:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' At best we have only 1 review that meets [[WP:V]]. I agree that special care should be taken over a fringe subject but even without that this book easily fails all points of [[WP:NBOOK]]. [[User:Azuredivay|Azuredivay]] ([[User talk:Azuredivay|talk]]) 11:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
*'''delete''', one review doesn't prove notability. [[User:Artem.G|Artem.G]] ([[User talk:Artem.G|talk]]) 11:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:56, 19 June 2024

Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Book from conspiracy theorists that failed to attract any coverage or reviews. At best it has only received little coverage over disinformation it spread. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Garbage books that are written specifically for getting attention should attract coverage from more than just 2 twenty years old sources. If this book was published today it would be best fact checked on a fact checking website and we wont count it as coverage towards notability. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 03:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]