Talk:Security through obscurity: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 19 discussions to Talk:Security through obscurity/Archive 1. (BOT) Tag: Replaced |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--[[Special:Contributions/166.182.84.28|166.182.84.28]] ([[User talk:166.182.84.28|talk]]) 20:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC) |
--[[Special:Contributions/166.182.84.28|166.182.84.28]] ([[User talk:166.182.84.28|talk]]) 20:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
:I will be correcting this. Thanks for pointing it out. [[User:Skarz|skarz]] ([[User talk:Skarz|talk]]) 04:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
:I will be correcting this. Thanks for pointing it out. [[User:Skarz|skarz]] ([[User talk:Skarz|talk]]) 04:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
:In addition to everything you mentioned, there's also no actual difference between STO and the alternative. Adding more hex characters to a hash just increases its obscurity. [[Special:Contributions/207.91.187.66|207.91.187.66]] ([[User talk:207.91.187.66|talk]]) 18:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:03, 1 July 2024
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Intense Editorial Bias in this Article
1. The article does not say a single positive thing about security through obscurity in its entire text, only a litany of criticisms. Humorously, they felt the need to add a criticism section in an article consisting of nothing but criticism. 2. The article is focused entirely on information technology security, or, by way of analogy, locks in the history section. Security through Obscurity is a perfectly valid way to, say, position a nuclear launch site/vehicle. There is no mention whatsoever of myriad other security contexts. 3. The criticism amounts to a strawman that security through obscurity is the only method of security being used, rather than in concert with other forms of security. --166.182.84.28 (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- I will be correcting this. Thanks for pointing it out. skarz (talk) 04:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- In addition to everything you mentioned, there's also no actual difference between STO and the alternative. Adding more hex characters to a hash just increases its obscurity. 207.91.187.66 (talk) 18:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- C-Class Computer Security articles
- Mid-importance Computer Security articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Computer Security articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles